WWE 2K16 Season Pass Description!

[seanironmaiden]

Mojo Rawley..... 

Literally nobody could want him in the game.

[bluemonkeymagic]

When thinking about dlc, we should think about the models they can reuse.y2j, rvd etc.

[EZY]

I would love an ECW pack with Raven and Shane Douglas

[MarcusCouch10]

In the NXT Pack which is basically confirmed now I think we'll get...

*Blake & Murphy (NXT Tag Team Champs for a long time) *Bull Dempsey (Has been promoted a lot recently and plays a big NXT Role currently) *Samoa Joe (Came early June so definitely could be in) *William Regal (Last year there was JBL and so far we have not seen a William Regal yet so..)  *Dana Brooke (This is just a BONUS just in case there is a Diva in I think it'll be her since she was promoted heavily early in the year)

[MepsiPax]

"Does not Include MyPlayer Kick Start."

What the hell is that?

[mrelectriccity]

probably be few NXT superstars and divas and few legends, few new people hopefully Dudley Boys but doubt it.

 

and unfort looks like they forcing us to get it since they've fail to fix the community creation on 2k15 

"Does not Include MyPlayer Kick Start."

What the hell is that?

it accelerates ur caw in career mode, and season pass doesn't include it but if u digital pre-order bundle for $90 it comes with everything 

Edited October 6, 2015 by mrelectriccity

[the King Lives]

"7 classic matchups in a bonus WWE Hall of Fame Showcase" I hope this includes cinematic cutscenes and not just a regular match with a DLC character attached :-/

showcases have cutscenes they are never match after match

I think the only realistic NXT options (assuming none of the 4HW are in) are:
Alex Riley
Blake & Murphy
Bull Dempsey
Mojo Rawley
Rhyno
Samoa Joe
Solomon Crowe

As for the others, Road Dogg and Scott Hall/Razor seem like glaring omissions considering the rest of DX/The Kliq are in and they're both on good terms with WWE these days. The Dudley Boyz I would say have a slim chance considering Bubba was in the rumble, but he briefly went back to TNA after that so who knows. 

What other "Legends" could be included?
 

the dudleys could make it since they don't start working on the dlc till post release. they could also include sid

Really? If that's true then whats stopping them including the 4HW?

WWE is what's stopping them. It was a WWE Decision not a 2K decision the same decision that wouldn't let them use Cody Rhodes. why? IDK You'd have to ask vince. but this whole 4HW debate needs to die.  they aren't going to be in unless you CAD Them

[bluemonkeymagic]

See, this whole wwe stopping them thing is rubbish, where does it say wwe stopped them including the 4HW?

They said they pushed for them but that could mean time restraints

[Titavius]

From what I understand, 2K has to get some sort of OK from someone at WWE before they can put anything out. That doesn't mean somebody sits Vince McMahon himself down in front of a console, puts a pad in his hand and watches him button mash his way through my career. The OK could come from anybody. 

2K has their own deals with talent. 2K will contact the talent about making video game appearances, and the talent sign a 2K contract. Not a WWE contract. With regards to the roster, WWE act as a consultant. If WWE were going to be complete anal bitches about what they want in their game, they'd create their own video game company, instead of giving the game away to the highest bidder. Vince McMahon does not sit in a room with someone from 2K, and reel off a list of reasons why he doesn't want someone in the video game. It's never worked like that, even under THQ.  

Edited October 6, 2015 by Titan83

[the King Lives]

See, this whole wwe stopping them thing is rubbish, where does it say wwe stopped them including the 4HW?

They said they pushed for them but that could mean time restraints

no, as much as i don't always get along with titan83, he's correct, they have to get approval for every single bit of stuff put in the game from rosters to modes to features like blood. WWE has been trying to get blood removed for years but THQ and now 2K have fought for it.

by pushing for them means they tried to convince WWE that it was a highly requested group that was expecting them to be in the game. Vince doesn't care about the divas. yes he cares about money but he's so out of touch with the product he doesn't know what the gen populace wants. 

So yeah it all came down to vince/wwe. Remember when i said that RAWFSHOWTIME told me that Vince wanted the Matadore's in before the 4HW? maybe he lied to me about owen and sid but i do have this feeling the matadores makes it in as dlc while the 4HW don't. that's just my theory. hell all we have right now are theories.

From what I understand, 2K has to get some sort of OK from someone at WWE before they can put anything out. That doesn't mean somebody sits Vince McMahon himself down in front of a console, puts a pad in his hand and watches him button mash his way through my career. The OK could come from anybody. 

2K has their own deals with talent. 2K will contact the talent about making video game appearances, and the talent sign a 2K contract. Not a WWE contract. With regards to the roster, WWE act as a consultant. If WWE were going to be complete anal bitches about what they want in their game, they'd create their own video game company, instead of giving the game away to the highest bidder. Vince McMahon does not sit in a room with someone from 2K, and reel off a list of reasons why he doesn't want someone in the video game. It's never worked like that, even under THQ.  

actually it did. Cory Ledesma would go to WWE Headquarters and have meetings with WWE and their PR Teams to go over their (THQ's) list and compare what Vince/WWE wanted in the game (nostalgia story mode for example) etc. and vince/wwe would decide who they do/don't want. it has nothing to do with what's going on in the current wwe however. Vince has been wanting to get rid of blood in these games since SVR2010. but THQ fought for it every step of the way. It's a Give/Lose situation though. WWE has final say over everything.

[N'Jadaka]

Let's say 5 NXT & 5 Divas

That leaves 20 legends

Im hoping for

Hall

Road Dogg

Sid

Yokozuna

Goldberg

Hawk

Animal

D'Von

Bubba Ray

Roddy Piper

Dusty Rhodes

Mr Perfect

Eddie 

That still leaves at least 7 spots.

 

[Auday]

Mojo Rawley..... 

Literally nobody could want him in the game.

You need to be more hyped to want him in the game.

[the King Lives]

Let's say 5 NXT & 5 Divas

That leaves 20 legends

Im hoping for

Hall

Road Dogg

Sid

Yokozuna

Goldberg

Hawk

Animal

D'Von

Bubba Ray

Roddy Piper

Dusty Rhodes

Mr Perfect

Eddie 

That still leaves at least 7 spots.

 

if there was gonna be divas the description would have mentioned it. there won't be any more divas. and goldberg is out.  he's blackballed.

[PridefulRoar2]

"7 classic matchups in a bonus WWE Hall of Fame Showcase" I hope this includes cinematic cutscenes and not just a regular match with a DLC character attached :-/

showcases have cutscenes they are never match after match

Actually the bonus matches are normally just normal matches for example WWE2K14 Brock Lesnar vs. Goldberg was just a regular match to represent WMXX...When I say cinematic cutscenes im talking about during the match not the pre-match video. 

[the King Lives]

"7 classic matchups in a bonus WWE Hall of Fame Showcase" I hope this includes cinematic cutscenes and not just a regular match with a DLC character attached :-/

showcases have cutscenes they are never match after match

Actually the bonus matches are normally just normal matches for example WWE2K14 Brock Lesnar vs. Goldberg was just a regular match to represent WMXX...When I say cinematic cutscenes im talking about during the match not the pre-match video. 

there were cutscenes in that match and it wasn't a bonus match. i'm not talking about pre-match videos and the dlc is not going to be bonus matches it's going to be an actual showcase. that's the difference. now, the austin bonus matches may not have cutscenes, i agree with that and if they aren't going to have cutscenes i fail to see the point in including them lol

[Adm King]

HOF Showcase? Would love to play the best matches of Dusty

Edited October 7, 2015 by Adm King

[PridefulRoar2]

HOF showcase without the Hulkster sucks, but hopefully we get Eddie Vs. Lesnar somehow in the showcase...

[bluemonkeymagic]

From what I understand, 2K has to get some sort of OK from someone at WWE before they can put anything out. That doesn't mean somebody sits Vince McMahon himself down in front of a console, puts a pad in his hand and watches him button mash his way through my career. The OK could come from anybody. 

2K has their own deals with talent. 2K will contact the talent about making video game appearances, and the talent sign a 2K contract. Not a WWE contract. With regards to the roster, WWE act as a consultant. If WWE were going to be complete anal bitches about what they want in their game, they'd create their own video game company, instead of giving the game away to the highest bidder. Vince McMahon does not sit in a room with someone from 2K, and reel off a list of reasons why he doesn't want someone in the video game. It's never worked like that, even under THQ.  

tin foil hats...name one good reason why wwe would not allow at least one of the 4HW in the game?

We're not talking about CM Punk, all 4 of these girls are under contract.

All wwe cares about is $$

It's just 2k holding something back for next year, so they have a USP for 2k17

We might get Eddie as he was in 14, 

[ShadowGetsuga]

There was an interview after the announcement and some guy from 2k said something like 'we said no to the 4HW, make of that what you will' meaning there's more to this!

 

Just for clarification sake, here's what the Community Manager said regarding the 4 Horsewomen issue:

Did any of the Four Horsewomen make it in?

None of them will be in the game.

http://forums.2k.com/showthread.php?3272131-2K-announces-4-HorseWoman-not-available-this-year/page10&p=12493366#post12493366

 

Will there be any diva DLC whatsoever?

We're not talking DLC yet beyond the announcement. However, today's story only ruled out the Horsewomen. Take that as you will.

http://forums.2k.com/showthread.php?3272131-2K-announces-4-HorseWoman-not-available-this-year/page18&p=12495786#post12495786

[the King Lives]

From what I understand, 2K has to get some sort of OK from someone at WWE before they can put anything out. That doesn't mean somebody sits Vince McMahon himself down in front of a console, puts a pad in his hand and watches him button mash his way through my career. The OK could come from anybody. 

2K has their own deals with talent. 2K will contact the talent about making video game appearances, and the talent sign a 2K contract. Not a WWE contract. With regards to the roster, WWE act as a consultant. If WWE were going to be complete anal bitches about what they want in their game, they'd create their own video game company, instead of giving the game away to the highest bidder. Vince McMahon does not sit in a room with someone from 2K, and reel off a list of reasons why he doesn't want someone in the video game. It's never worked like that, even under THQ.  

tin foil hats...name one good reason why wwe would not allow at least one of the 4HW in the game?

We're not talking about CM Punk, all 4 of these girls are under contract.

All wwe cares about is $$

It's just 2k holding something back for next year, so they have a USP for 2k17

We might get Eddie as he was in 14, 

because they wanted the matadore's in. cause vince said something like " The Bellas have to be in every year before the 4hw make it in" and that vince likes the matadores more. it's pretty clear as to why the divas hardly gets any time up till now.  and no we won't get the 4hw next year. they probably won't even be together next year. it's time to let this go. They just made it on the current roster. NXT is developmental.