McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 (edited) -REMOVED- Edited November 1, 2014 by McLeod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it. Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /: Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any. So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton! really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a MillionBray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360) Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it. Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /: Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any. So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton! really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a MillionBray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360) Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay. you're not going to see a difference in the models though, because it's exactly the same model. nothing has been tampered with. if you see a difference with the Wyatt model, you're going to see a difference in the surroundings too. can you see a difference in the safety mats or the barricade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it. Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /: Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any. So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton! really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a MillionBray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360) Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay. you're not going to see a difference in the models though, because it's exactly the same model. nothing has been tampered with. if you see a difference with the Wyatt model, you're going to see a difference in the surroundings too. can you see a difference in the safety mats or the barricade? Nobody said that the models themselves look different. He just mentioned that 2k15 has a new lightning system (which is a fact) and that some models look better under it and others don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 some models look better under it and others don't. oorrr.. everything looks exactly the same? if you choose to see a difference, that's cool. i can't prevent that, and why would i bother. pointless argument anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 (edited) I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 Edited November 1, 2014 by McLeod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm* I meant the model dumbass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm* I meant the model dumbass. what's wrong with the model? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I don't know, maybe everything!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm* I meant the model dumbass. what's wrong with the model? The 2k15 one doesn't look like Vinnie Mac...at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places. 2k14 2k15 lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm* I meant the model dumbass. what's wrong with the model? The 2k15 one doesn't look like Vinnie Mac...at all. the models are the same. 2k15 uses a different hair model, but everything from the head down is the same. the size of the yobj file that contains the model is the same. the offsets and parameter's are the same. i think the two of you are confusing textures with graphics. yet i'm the dumbass somehow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead! LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead! LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real. I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum? Can't even remember how this argument got started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead! LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real. I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum? Can't even remember how this argument got started. That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 (edited) That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting. Texture mapping is something you apply over a Computer Generated Graphic. In this case, a 3D model. Depending on the resolution and quality of the texture, it will either enhance the look, thereby complimenting the graphic, or make it look like dog shit. (in the case of Booker T for example). Do you get what I'm saying? Go to the modding section. Texture edits do wonders for the look of the game. It doesn't change the Graphics. To do that you'd have to start your own game from scratch. That essentially is what Next Gen is. Edited November 1, 2014 by Titan83 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting. Texture mapping is something you apply over a Computer Generated Graphic. In this case, a 3D model. Depending on the resolution and quality of the texture, it will either enhance the look, thereby complimenting the graphic, or make it look like dog shit. (in the case of Booker T for example). Do you get what I'm saying? Go to the modding section. Texture edits do wonders for the look of the game. It doesn't change the Graphics. To do that you'd have to start your own game from scratch. That essentially is what Next Gen is. To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 confusing textures with graphics. Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific. Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!" going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead! LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real. I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum? Can't even remember how this argument got started. What argument? I'm just having fun over here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero. Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Jcsix came on here the other day and tried to explain what different Textures do for 3D Models. Nobody tried to argue with him though, they just blatantly ignored him lol Can somebody tell me I'm wasting my time please To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together. Have a read up on 3D modelling. You'll find that the models themselves are the Graphics. Models that have been created for 2K15 on Next Gen for example won't work in a Last Gen game, because the old systems just aren't capable of displaying them. That's Graphics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLeod Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Jcsix came on here the other day and tried to explain what different Textures do for 3D Models. Nobody tried to argue with him though, they just blatantly ignored him lol Can somebody tell me I'm wasting my time please To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together. Have a read up on 3D modelling. You'll find that the models themselves are the Graphics. Models that have been created for 2K15 on Next Gen for example won't work in a Last Gen game, because the old systems just aren't capable of displaying them. That's Graphics. I tried looking around and couldn't find anything referring to models as graphics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAST987 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I voted WWE 2K14 don't care what anyone thinks Reasons Roster Intact modes - all the modes are there No other restrictions Better DLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the King Lives Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I voted WWE 2K14 don't care what anyone thinks Reasons Roster Intact modes - all the modes are there No other restrictions Better DLC you're thoughts are your own, i respect that, but the only reason i'd pick 2k15 is i just want to renounce any game that THQ had a hand in, and we all know that 2k14 was already in development before 2k got their hands on it. Heck they didn't even want to release 2k14 but WWE forced their hand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.