Jump to content
 

WWE 2k15 vs WWE 2k14


BrotchMrToast

WWE 2k15 vs WWE 2k14  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you prefer?

    • WWE 2k15
      25
    • WWE 2k14
      28


Recommended Posts

I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it.

Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /:

Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any.

So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton!

:/ really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a Million

Bray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)

23svima.jpg

Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360)

2s01yt1.jpg

Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it.

Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /:

Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any.

So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton!

:/ really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a Million

Bray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)

23svima.jpg

Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360)

2s01yt1.jpg

Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay.

 

 

you're not going to see a difference in the models though, because it's exactly the same model. nothing has been tampered with. if you see a difference with the Wyatt model, you're going to see a difference in the surroundings too. can you see a difference in the safety mats or the barricade? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how they made some excuse about the lighting being the reason things didn't look very good in '14, when it actually looks worse now that they've changed it.

Some models look better under the new lighting but honestly, I don't feel like it did any favors for the rest of the roster including CAWs and the arenas and whatnot... /:

Idk, maybe it's just me. But they probably wasted a decent amount of time on that when it didn't help much if any.

So if I had to choose which I prefer between the two, I'd still have to say 2k15. I can't go back to '14 now that I've switched up my CAWs moveset a ton!

:/ really? again? if you can see any differences in graphics in either of these two images, i'll personally send you a cheque for a Million

Bray Wyatt imported into 2K14 (Xbox 360)

23svima.jpg

Bray Wyatt 2K15 (Xbox 360)

2s01yt1.jpg

Actually, I can. The Wyatt model on 2k15 is more...dim while on 2k14 he's a little shinier. The difference is a very small one, barely noticeable on those pictures, but it's apparent. It's more noticeable during the gameplay.

you're not going to see a difference in the models though, because it's exactly the same model. nothing has been tampered with. if you see a difference with the Wyatt model, you're going to see a difference in the surroundings too. can you see a difference in the safety mats or the barricade?

Nobody said that the models themselves look different. He just mentioned that 2k15 has a new lightning system (which is a fact) and that some models look better under it and others don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some models look better under it and others don't.

 

oorrr.. everything looks exactly the same? if you choose to see a difference, that's cool. i can't prevent that, and why would i bother. pointless argument anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

 

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

 

2k15

aHhPytw.png

Edited by McLeod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

 

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

 

2k15

aHhPytw.png

 

lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

 

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

 

2k15

aHhPytw.png

 

lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm*

 

I meant the model dumbass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

 

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

 

2k15

aHhPytw.png

 

lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm*

 

I meant the model dumbass.

 

 

what's wrong with the model?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

2k15

aHhPytw.png

lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm*

I meant the model dumbass.

what's wrong with the model?

The 2k15 one doesn't look like Vinnie Mac...at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

I think we can all agree that the graphics are different in some places.

2k14

WWE_2K14_Screenshot.78.jpg

2k15

aHhPytw.png

lol niccee comparison.. shit, looks like my pics no longer mean shit to anybody. you've really nailed the difference, what with the pic with that 90's grain filter and then the pic taken from a 480p youtube video *sarcasm*

I meant the model dumbass.

what's wrong with the model?

The 2k15 one doesn't look like Vinnie Mac...at all.

 

 

the models are the same. 2k15 uses a different hair model, but everything from the head down is the same. the size of the yobj file that contains the model is the same. the offsets and parameter's are the same. 

 

i think the two of you are confusing textures with graphics. yet i'm the dumbass somehow  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

confusing textures with graphics.

 

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

 

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

confusing textures with graphics.

 

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

 

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

 

 

going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

confusing textures with graphics.

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead!

LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

confusing textures with graphics.

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead!

LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real.

 

 

I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum? 

 

Can't even remember how this argument got started.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

confusing textures with graphics.

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead!

LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real.

 

 

I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum? 

 

Can't even remember how this argument got started.  

 

That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting.

 

 

Texture mapping is something you apply over a Computer Generated Graphic. In this case, a 3D model. Depending on the resolution and quality of the texture, it will either enhance the look, thereby complimenting the graphic, or make it look like dog shit. (in the case of Booker T for example). 

 

Do you get what I'm saying? Go to the modding section. Texture edits do wonders for the look of the game. It doesn't change the Graphics. To do that you'd have to start your own game from scratch. That essentially is what Next Gen is.

Edited by Titan83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's not what you said, you said there was a difference between textures and GRAPHICS, when in reality graphics covers textures, models, and lighting.

 

 

Texture mapping is something you apply over a Computer Generated Graphic. In this case, a 3D model. Depending on the resolution and quality of the texture, it will either enhance the look, thereby complimenting the graphic, or make it look like dog shit. (in the case of Booker T for example). 

 

Do you get what I'm saying? Go to the modding section. Texture edits do wonders for the look of the game. It doesn't change the Graphics. To do that you'd have to start your own game from scratch. That essentially is what Next Gen is.

 

To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

confusing textures with graphics.

Graphics covers the whole visual spectrum, (models, textures, lighting). Graphics isn't one thing in specific.

Also it doesn't matter if the models are the exact same, it just comes down to does 2k14's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon, "Yes", does 2k15's Vince McMahon look like Vince McMahon,"No!"

going to Uni was obviously a huge waste of my life. should have just come here instead!
LMAO like they taught you this. C'mon man, be real.

I've got a BFA in Graphic Design. All I'm saying is that there is a difference between Texture mapping and 3D models. I don't understand why you're so keen to disprove what I'm saying. lol It's supposed to be a discussion forum?

Can't even remember how this argument got started.

What argument? I'm just having fun over here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jcsix came on here the other day and tried to explain what different Textures do for 3D Models. Nobody tried to argue with him though, they just blatantly ignored him lol 

 

Can somebody tell me I'm wasting my time please :) 

 

 

To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together.

 

 

Have a read up on 3D modelling. You'll find that the models themselves are the Graphics. Models that have been created for 2K15 on Next Gen for example won't work in a Last Gen game, because the old systems just aren't capable of displaying them. That's Graphics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jcsix came on here the other day and tried to explain what different Textures do for 3D Models. Nobody tried to argue with him though, they just blatantly ignored him lol 

 

Can somebody tell me I'm wasting my time please :)

 

 

To me it sounds like you're just describing models here, from my knowledge graphics was expressed to summarize the look of the textures, models, and lighting all together.

 

 

Have a read up on 3D modelling. You'll find that the models themselves are the Graphics. Models that have been created for 2K15 on Next Gen for example won't work in a Last Gen game, because the old systems just aren't capable of displaying them. That's Graphics. 

I tried looking around and couldn't find anything referring to models as graphics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted WWE 2K14 don't care what anyone thinks

 

Reasons

 

  • Roster
  • Intact modes - all the modes are there
  • No other restrictions
  • Better DLC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I voted WWE 2K14 don't care what anyone thinks

 

Reasons

 

  • Roster
  • Intact modes - all the modes are there
  • No other restrictions
  • Better DLC

 

you're thoughts are your own, i respect that, but the only reason i'd pick 2k15 is i just want to renounce any game that THQ had a hand in, and we all know that 2k14 was already in development before 2k got their hands on it.  Heck they didn't even want to release 2k14 but WWE forced their hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.