Nate Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. He isn't getting paid for this. It's a pretty simple scenario. From the man who knows what he's talking about. Listen up folks, this guy has swung with 'em all! Shut up, they are using his face and likeness. He is not getting money. He can sue for money. Simple as that, don't be stupid. Quote
BrotchMrToast Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. He isn't getting paid for this. It's a pretty simple scenario. From the man who knows what he's talking about. Listen up folks, this guy has swung with 'em all! Shut up, they are using his face and likeness. He is not getting money. He can sue for money. Simple as that, don't be stupid. I never denied that, and that's not the reason I'm pissed. Quote
OLD ACCOUNT Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Can we trade Punk out for Christian? Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) He won't be removed he's part of the rivalry mode with Cena Well serve 2k right from all the greatest rivarliers they choose Punk Vs Cena where we could of had Mankind Vs Undertaker ( imagine the matches we would of got Boiler Room Brawl, Buried Alive Match improved for the PS4) , SCSA Vs The Rock, The Rock Vs HHH, HBK Vs Bret. We GOT ALL THAT ON WWE'13 SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LEGENDS SHIT. WHAT ? Edited September 4, 2014 by BEAST987 Quote
Titavius Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. No, that's what you'd say if you were a mark. And why do people think the game will be effected by CM Punk and his lawsuit in anyway? Guess what? It won't. Let's put this to bed. Punk isn't getting royalties directly from this game. Nobody involved in the game get's royalties directly from the fucking game. WWE the company get all the royalties, and the royalties are dished out amoungst the talent. (A lesson in royalties 101. Thank me later) So assuming that the game is getting "pushed back" or delayed or whatever because of this lawsuit, makes absolutely no sense. Punk wants his share of the royalties. That's on the WWE. Has no effect on 2K or their game in any way whatsoever. The WWE may request that 2K remove CM Punk's likeness as best they can, but they won't now because of how far they are into production. IF Punk has a case, he'll probably end up getting his share of the royalties. WWE will have to give them to him. Simple. Once again, either way has no effect on the video game or its production. Topic closed. I've closed it with logic. Edited September 4, 2014 by Titan83 Quote
Auday Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 He won't be removed he's part of the rivalry mode with CenaWell serve 2k right from all the greatest rivarliers they choose Punk Vs Cena where we could of had Mankind Vs Undertaker ( imagine the matches we would of got Boiler Room Brawl, Buried Alive Match improved for the PS4) , SCSA Vs The Rock, The Rock Vs HHH, HBK Vs Bret.We GOT ALL THAT ON WWE'13 SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LEGENDS SHIT. WHAT ? WHAT you read, shut the fuck up with your legends shit, the attitude era full story was on WWE'13 go fuck it as much as you want. Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 He won't be removed he's part of the rivalry mode with Cena Well serve 2k right from all the greatest rivarliers they choose Punk Vs Cena where we could of had Mankind Vs Undertaker ( imagine the matches we would of got Boiler Room Brawl, Buried Alive Match improved for the PS4) , SCSA Vs The Rock, The Rock Vs HHH, HBK Vs Bret. We GOT ALL THAT ON WWE'13 SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LEGENDS SHIT. WHAT ? WHAT you read, shut the fuck up with your legends shit, the attitude era full story was on WWE'13 go fuck it as much as you want. WHAT? Quote
DrJoeyMagnum Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 BEAST is doing the what chant to Auday great stuff Quote
Auday Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 He won't be removed he's part of the rivalry mode with CenaWell serve 2k right from all the greatest rivarliers they choose Punk Vs Cena where we could of had Mankind Vs Undertaker ( imagine the matches we would of got Boiler Room Brawl, Buried Alive Match improved for the PS4) , SCSA Vs The Rock, The Rock Vs HHH, HBK Vs Bret.We GOT ALL THAT ON WWE'13 SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LEGENDS SHIT.WHAT ?WHAT you read, shut the fuck up with your legends shit, the attitude era full story was on WWE'13 go fuck it as much as you want. WHAT? Tbh not funny at all, do something new.... A fucking idiot. Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) He won't be removed he's part of the rivalry mode with CenaWell serve 2k right from all the greatest rivarliers they choose Punk Vs Cena where we could of had Mankind Vs Undertaker ( imagine the matches we would of got Boiler Room Brawl, Buried Alive Match improved for the PS4) , SCSA Vs The Rock, The Rock Vs HHH, HBK Vs Bret.We GOT ALL THAT ON WWE'13 SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LEGENDS SHIT.WHAT ?WHAT you read, shut the fuck up with your legends shit, the attitude era full story was on WWE'13 go fuck it as much as you want.WHAT? Tbh not funny at all, do something new.... A fucking idiot. WHAT ? OR EITHER ADAPT OR PERISH Edited September 4, 2014 by BEAST987 Quote
Zero. Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) Auday's Right. Edited September 4, 2014 by ¤Josh¤ Quote
Tamer™ Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 I'm sorry but Beast, you said Adapt or Perish yet you used something from the 90's. It's like: Fuck logic. Quote
Titavius Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Evolution isn't a current thing. They formed like 12 years ago. That's older than most of the people on this board.. 1 Quote
Fozy Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. No, that's what you'd say if you were a mark. And why do people think the game will be effected by CM Punk and his lawsuit in anyway? Guess what? It won't. Let's put this to bed. Punk isn't getting royalties directly from this game. Nobody involved in the game get's royalties directly from the fucking game. WWE the company get all the royalties, and the royalties are dished out amoungst the talent. (A lesson in royalties 101. Thank me later) So assuming that the game is getting "pushed back" or delayed or whatever because of this lawsuit, makes absolutely no sense. Punk wants his share of the royalties. That's on the WWE. Has no effect on 2K or their game in any way whatsoever. The WWE may request that 2K remove CM Punk's likeness as best they can, but they won't now because of how far they are into production. IF Punk has a case, he'll probably end up getting his share of the royalties. WWE will have to give them to him. Simple. Once again, either way has no effect on the video game or its production. Topic closed. I've closed it with logic. The game won't be pushed back or delayed, but what you say about Punk not being a big draw for the game is a bit uninformed. The main feature is now this rivalry mode. Punk is one of the 4 people involved in this, to say he's not a big draw is pretty crazy. Quote
Titavius Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. No, that's what you'd say if you were a mark. And why do people think the game will be effected by CM Punk and his lawsuit in anyway? Guess what? It won't. Let's put this to bed. Punk isn't getting royalties directly from this game. Nobody involved in the game get's royalties directly from the fucking game. WWE the company get all the royalties, and the royalties are dished out amoungst the talent. (A lesson in royalties 101. Thank me later) So assuming that the game is getting "pushed back" or delayed or whatever because of this lawsuit, makes absolutely no sense. Punk wants his share of the royalties. That's on the WWE. Has no effect on 2K or their game in any way whatsoever. The WWE may request that 2K remove CM Punk's likeness as best they can, but they won't now because of how far they are into production. IF Punk has a case, he'll probably end up getting his share of the royalties. WWE will have to give them to him. Simple. Once again, either way has no effect on the video game or its production. Topic closed. I've closed it with logic. The game won't be pushed back or delayed, but what you say about Punk not being a big draw for the game is a bit uninformed. The main feature is now this rivalry mode. Punk is one of the 4 people involved in this, to say he's not a big draw is pretty crazy. I never said he wasn't a big draw. It's just a mark way of looking at things. I'm in no way a John Cena fan, but it's safe to say he's a bigger draw, which is why he's on the cover this year. Clever, really. To suggest that one character alone is going to be a major factor in whether people choose to buy the game or not, is ridiculous. WWE's television ratings haven't seen a dramatic rise nor a decline since Punks leaving. That's just not me arguing for the sake of arguing, that's fact. Edited September 4, 2014 by Titan83 Quote
Fozy Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Wow, I don't think any of you know what you're talking about. Strum pretty much nails it. They're using his likeness for a game in which he will be a big draw for. No, that's what you'd say if you were a mark. And why do people think the game will be effected by CM Punk and his lawsuit in anyway? Guess what? It won't. Let's put this to bed. Punk isn't getting royalties directly from this game. Nobody involved in the game get's royalties directly from the fucking game. WWE the company get all the royalties, and the royalties are dished out amoungst the talent. (A lesson in royalties 101. Thank me later) So assuming that the game is getting "pushed back" or delayed or whatever because of this lawsuit, makes absolutely no sense. Punk wants his share of the royalties. That's on the WWE. Has no effect on 2K or their game in any way whatsoever. The WWE may request that 2K remove CM Punk's likeness as best they can, but they won't now because of how far they are into production. IF Punk has a case, he'll probably end up getting his share of the royalties. WWE will have to give them to him. Simple. Once again, either way has no effect on the video game or its production. Topic closed. I've closed it with logic. The game won't be pushed back or delayed, but what you say about Punk not being a big draw for the game is a bit uninformed. The main feature is now this rivalry mode. Punk is one of the 4 people involved in this, to say he's not a big draw is pretty crazy. I never said he wasn't a big draw. It's just a mark way of looking at things. I'm in no way a John Cena fan, but it's safe to say he's a bigger draw, which is why he's on the cover this year. Clever, really. To suggest that one character alone is going to be a major factor in whether people choose to buy the game or not, is ridiculous. WWE's television ratings haven't seen a dramatic rise nor a decline since Punks leaving. That's just not me arguing for the sake of arguing, that's fact. You realise a mark is a general wrestling fan, right? I'm pretty sure CM Punk is extremely popular and his feud with Cena is one of the most prominent of the last 10 years. Quote
Titavius Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) I'm sorry, would you rather I'd said.. "that's a CM Punk Mark way of looking at things" A Mark is also somebody who is so passionate about Wrestling or a specific character that they buy into kayfabe as though it were real. At least it was 15 years ago. I don't think Kayfabe is a recognized term amoungst Wrestling fans anymore. Probably because is doesn't exist in this era where everything is followed on twitter. Edited September 4, 2014 by Titan83 Quote
MOB. Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 If they keep selling his merchandise, then that and the obvious game royalties are the only money that Punk is owed, otherwise, he can get the hell out because any other money he gets outside of that he doesn't deserve because he breached his contract. Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Shut the fuck up Beast Make me Toast Roast Brotch Crotch whatever your name is Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 I'm sorry but Beast, you said Adapt or Perish yet you used something from the 90's. It's like: Fuck logic. Triple H said it a few months back Quote
BEAST987 Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 Took The words out my mouth. I will take something out of your mouth son and that will be your tongue Quote
the King Lives Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 well maybe wwe should counter sue him for breach of contract Coming up next week... Wwe2k15 confessed to be delayed! Lol Quote
Tamer™ Posted September 4, 2014 Posted September 4, 2014 I'm sorry but Beast, you said Adapt or Perish yet you used something from the 90's. It's like: Fuck logic. Triple H said it a few months backI was referring to: WHAT?. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.