Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

Posted

@jeffsdomain:  2K did get Hogan for 2K14 and he was in TNA.  Looks like TNA is pretty flexible when it comes to games for WWE and their talents.....

Actually, Hogan had a contract where he could do outside deals. He was the only one in TNA with that contract.

Posted

What I hope happens is the crew with a bunch of security guards and tables and all set up the roster reveal and Lesnar comes in at the end and demolishes it all

i never bought into the hype with lesnar at all

Posted

@Bob_Van_Dam:  Well, then "The Hulkster" was the smartest guy in TNA then.  Imagine if guys like the Hardys, Dudleys, and Kurt Angle could do the same thing!  Then 2K could do a proper 30 Years of Mania with all the matches that were left out, of course minus Benoit.....

Posted

 

What I hope happens is the crew with a bunch of security guards and tables and all set up the roster reveal and Lesnar comes in at the end and demolishes it all

i never bought into the hype with lesnar at all

 

He defeated the streak, incase you were interested.

Posted

 

 

What I hope happens is the crew with a bunch of security guards and tables and all set up the roster reveal and Lesnar comes in at the end and demolishes it all

i never bought into the hype with lesnar at all

 

He defeated the streak, incase you were interested.

 

something i tend to ignore, just like i ignore the whole big e/ziggler/aj break up lol and him losing the title because del rio gave him a concussion lol

Posted

@AgeofSandow:  I didn't have a problem with Lesnar breaking the streak, I had a problem with not having an epic storyline to explain why it happened.  So now every time I see a retro streak match with Taker, I shake my head knowing how it ends.  Lesnar and Taker didn't feud much leading up to WM 30 and there was no great story to tell, which made it all useless in my view.

Posted

@AgeofSandow:  I didn't have a problem with Lesnar breaking the streak, I had a problem with not having an epic storyline to explain why it happened.  So now every time I see a retro streak match with Taker, I shake my head knowing how it ends.  Lesnar and Taker didn't feud much leading up to WM 30 and there was no great story to tell, which made it all useless in my view.

i'm starting to think this all came about from that appearance at lesnar's ufc title bout when they were interviewing taker at that event and lesnar walked by and taker was like "do you want it?" cause not too long after that, lesnar returned i mean it made the most sense but yeah that storyline was horrible. and that's why i refuse to acknowledge him defeating the streak.  Again i say it made sense cause he's the only one taker really struggled with defeating one on one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.