Jump to content
 

WWE 2K 2003 story help?


Thedeadmanrising

Recommended Posts

I have plans on making "here comes the pain" based stories and its the scenario of all the guys that should have been world champ around that time get the chance to be it. And I am starting on the raw volumes. And I have already chosen Booker T as one of the guys to playthrough as, I just need 2 other guys that should have gotten that chance. So who do you all think I should put and what do you all want to see be featured?

Edited by Thedeadmanrising
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would deffinately have Angle & Benoit feuding over the WWE Title.

 

As Triple H is the World Champion I would have him feuding with Big Poppa Pump also. You have two ways with this.

 

1. Keep the same result so Booker vs Hunter headlines Wrestlemania.

 

2. Have Steiner just pummel the Game and take the belt at the Rumble and subsquently dominate him in the rematch at No Way Out which would then set up a Steiner vs Booker Wrestlemania match which would be on par to the matches they had in WCW when they feuded over the WCW Title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly I just need to know who along with Booker should be in the story because their will be a branching in the beginning where the player choose either Booker T or the two other guys. I just want to know who do you all want to be the other two?

Edited by Thedeadmanrising
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly I just need to know who along with Booker should be in the story because their will be a branching in the beginning where the player choose either Booker T or the two other guys. I just want to know who do you all want to be the other two?

 

I wouldnt mind seeing Goldust in the story as from memory he and Booker tagged a fair bit and be interesting to see what would happen if the other guy went higher up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're naming two guys who SHOULDA been World Champion around that time frame, I'd have to, by far, say Goldust and Shawn Michaels shoulda gotten a WAY longer reign than he got. Not Scott Steiner. Fuck Scott Steiner, he's worthless.

 

... And fat.

 

As for the WWE Title, Chris Benoit, definately, John Cena shoulda gotten it back then when he was 10x better than he is now, and Rey Mysterio shoulda gotten a run aswell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take Goldust under consideration. I may give the third spot to Jericho or RVD; if thats alright? But I'm still worried about the smackdown choices I know Benoit should be one of them, but who should be the other two choices?

Edited by Thedeadmanrising
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're naming two guys who SHOULDA been World Champion around that time frame, I'd have to, by far, say Goldust and Shawn Michaels shoulda gotten a WAY longer reign than he got. Not Scott Steiner. Fuck Scott Steiner, he's worthless.

 

... And fat.

 

As for the WWE Title, Chris Benoit, definately, John Cena shoulda gotten it back then when he was 10x better than he is now, and Rey Mysterio shoulda gotten a run aswell.

 

In Regards to Shawn Michaels I would have liked to seen him keep the belt till at least Mania.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well before we get off topic; I just want to know who should be beside Benoit as the three choices for the Smackdown story?

Edited by Thedeadmanrising
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well before we get off topic; I just want to know who should be beside Benoit as the three choices for the Smackdown story?

 

Kurt Angle unless your having him as the Champion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Test is a must for this storyline

 

Test would have been a must if this had been 1999 when he was clearly the favourite guy that should have taken the WWF title yet Vince wanted Show who wasent even in the Trips storyline. That would of been great to seen Test get his revenge for Hunter ruining his wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Test is a must for this storyline

Test would have been a must if this had been 1999 when he was clearly the favourite guy that should have taken the WWF title yet Vince wanted Show who wasent even in the Trips storyline. That would of been great to seen Test get his revenge for Hunter ruining his wedding. yeah it wouldve , major flop on the part of the creative team back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Eddie Guerrero as another one of the smackdown choices? I feel his WWE title reign was too short anyways and I feel he was ready for a WWE title run 2003. Is Eddie a good candidate as one of the choices?

Edited by Thedeadmanrising
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Eddie Guerrero as another one of the smackdown choices? I feel his WWE title reign was too short anyways and I feel he was ready for a WWE title run 2003. Is Eddie a good candidate as one of the choices?

 

At first I thought no because he had only recently been rehired after he got fired in 2001 but then realised he came back in April 2002. If your building up to something big I suppose Big Show could be considered a potential opponent for Angle as I remember the previous year Angle cutting a deal with Lesnar to help eliminate Show from contendership. Then again it might be interesting if Edge had gotten a shot at the belt as I know Edge & Benoit teamed with Lesnar to face team Angle well until Edge got injured and couldnt compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.