DrugFreeMisfit Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Considering they already have the models, it would be a cheap and easy solution to include Attitude Era DLC pack with all of the attitude era characters from WWE 13. Maybe this is a good idea, maybe I'm just marking out at the idea of including the Big Bossman in as the kingpin of the Shield or actually having a Kliq stable with retro HBK, Razor Ramon, Diesel, X-Pac, and the Hunter Hearst Helmsley model from WWE 13. Also including the possibility of New Age Outlaws, Road Warriors, A.P.A., Pillman, Bulldog, Chainsaw Charlie, Ganrel, Shamrock, DDP, Goldust, Too Cool, Godfather, Vader, Val Venis, and include the Ministry attire for the Phenom addition. I would pay extra appart from fan axcess just to make the roster that much larger. Some characters may be redundant but like I said, the have all of the things they need to include them, movesets, entrance themes, trons, and most importantly, the character models. It would be easy money for 2K. Yes I understand the licensing issues for some characters. However, considering James, Gunn, Simmons, JBL, and Goldust, work there, that wouldn't be a problem. Please leave your feedback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanironmaiden Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 New Age outlaws and X-Pac would be great. especially if they fixed NAO's entrance. Talking to Aubrey at Summerslam Axxess I asked about X-Pac's inclusion and while obviously he couldnt release any info about the final roster at that stage, did sorta hint that he might be in there somewhere. Really like your idea about Attitude era Bossman as part of the Shield, that would be awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VinceRusso Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 (edited) i really would like to get the rest of dx and APA in the game the rest would be a bonus to me Edited October 10, 2013 by VinceRusso Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
best in the world Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 I'd like to see a WCW Attitude era pack which is every WCW big star from that era for rivals against the WWF Attitude guys. I doubt that will ever happen, but old school fans would appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4th Doctor Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob_Van_Dam Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4th Doctor Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Dancing Dan Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude If you want to go and play your Super Nintendo WWF Royal Rumble,WWF Wrestle-Mania The Arcade Game or the Super Wrestle-Mania for your Hulkmania. If you want just get the video game RAW 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4th Doctor Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 (edited) Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude If you want to go and play your Super Nintendo WWF Royal Rumble,WWF Wrestle-Mania The Arcade Game or the Super Wrestle-Mania for your Hulkmania. If you want just get the video game RAW 2. Attitude takes Top Priorty way to much over the other eras. Now go back and make your failed gimmicks of current superstars that nobody remembers. Edited October 10, 2013 by The 4th Doctor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob_Van_Dam Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Stop complaining in topics and go back to complaining on twitter, "Broski Barrage". You don't want me to say more... because this can get real embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beardy Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Stop complaining in topics and go back to complaining on twitter, "Broski Barrage". You don't want me to say more... because this can get real embarrassing. BVD! BVD! BVD! BVD! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zark Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krrush Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 i would really like to have a monday night wars pack with hall nash and syxx nWo as well as DX with hbx hhh xpac and outlaws dont care about rest of attitude era because i still play 13 maybe, just maybe they drop the bomb and implement some way to carry over the 13 roster into 2k14 like they did with legends of wrestlemania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrugFreeMisfit Posted October 12, 2013 Author Share Posted October 12, 2013 Look, I understand the reason to say "Go play WWE 13 for Attitude Era" but come on guys. That would make the roster that much bigger. It wouldn't be taking anything away. Yeah, I could go play WWE 13, but would I have the ability to use newer additions like Warrior, Razor, Diesel, Goldberg, and others in a Universe mode along with Road Warriors, DX ( the greater DX, not the reincarnation of the late 2000's with only HHH and HBK). No I wouldn't. We would also have the Helmsley attire to go along with the rest of the Kliq. What's the point in making a Kliq stable with retro HBK, Razor, Diesel, and the current model for HHH. (Yes I know that there is a "retro" model for HHH in 2k14, but is a hairstyle really a call for a retro version when that's all that changes?) I would totally agree if I were saying that we should have characters from WWF Attitude or Here Comes the Pain because those are from the PS1 and PS2 generations, respectively. However, I'm talking about a game that is a year old with essential no contrast in graphics and made with the same technology. Same models that would be downloaded to your hardrive from XBL or PSN as DLC. Therefore they wouldn't require any disk space to take away from anything else. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY: if you don't like it, DON'T BUY IT. simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcsix Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 The problem is, most of the guys listed hasn't had a memorable WM moment/match, which the game is about. I'd say the exact same thing to people who want more GE guys, more NG guys, RA guys etc. Yes, its nice, but why have them in, if they didn't have that great WM match or moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titavius Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Stop complaining in topics and go back to complaining on twitter, "Broski Barrage". You don't want me to say more... because this can get real embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrugFreeMisfit Posted October 12, 2013 Author Share Posted October 12, 2013 I didn't know they had to have a WM moment for them to be used in a universe mode of our own design? The ECW, WCW, AWA, and US Spinner championships from that Championship DLC pack last year didn't play any significant role in WWE's Attitude Era but people still used them. DDP had no part in WWE's Attitude Era, but people used him. That's why I said DLC, not on-disc. People keep saying we don't need them. Those people would all be hypocrites, because even though they don't "need" them, they would still use them in Universe Mode. Don't lie. Like I said, it would only make the roster larger and wouldn't take anything away from the rest of the game. Why not have more? Until there are more valid reasons to not have them instead of vice-versa, my chance will stay the same. Whether or not they are "needed" is irrelevant..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4th Doctor Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Not everyone wants Current guys (ask bugsy) can't please everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Dancing Dan Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I hope we get Current DLC, Ruthless Aggression DLC, Golden Era DLC & Attitude DLC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrugFreeMisfit Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Judging by your standards, maybe you should go play every game before 1992 and between 2001 and 2008 if you want "Hulkamania Era" and Ruthless Aggression Era. Don't buy this DLC if they offer it. As a matter of fact, don't buy the game at all. Your "Hulkamania" Era should be rightfully named Golden Era or at least Rock and Wrestling Era if you were a legitimate wrestling fan, but seeing as how you have Doctor Who as you avi on a wrestling site, there is obviously a different precedent for you. I mean, by calling it the Hulkamania Era, you're insisting that Hogan was the only draw during that time. They don't call it the Austin Era, it's the Attitude Era. Do you call the PG Era the Cenation Era, too? Therefore, if you want to throw out Sandow memes, please enlighten me with your irrelevant opinion as to why the Golden Era and Ruthless Aggression Era should take, not equal, but a higher priority than the Attitude Era, you ignorant, self-centered imbecile. I think they should all be equal. I only called for an Attitude Era DLC because they already have the models, moversets, entrance themes, trons, superstar thread settings, etc., ready at the current moment without having to do any added work, apart for remodeling the Booker T model. Obviously, after the statements I've made, I would gladly take anyone and everyone that they gave us for DLC. Yes, not everyone wants it, but I'm sure that if they gave that to us as a DLC pack, everyone would find some use for it somehow. Remember, this would be something extra, as they wouldn't give us anything in exchange if they didn't make it. Reminder, nothing would take its place if they didn't give it to us. Just like the on-disc roster, take what you can get, because saying that a retro Big Show, as pointless as that may be, should not be a roster spot would not give you any one else otherwise. But, you're right 4th Doctor. That's what you want to hear from everyone on here, so I'll go ahead and stroke your ego. It may not be a good idea, but I'm trying to give an idea on how to improve the future for WWE Games, in that we should be able to port rosters over from previous games where the graphics are so similar. However, all you want on this site is a bunch of ignorant yes-men to tell you that every idea or thought you have is the best one possible and if you don't agree with anyone that their opinion is totally irrelevant to the rest of the WWE Universe. You're Welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotchMrToast Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Judging by your standards, maybe you should go play every game before 1992 and between 2001 and 2008 if you want "Hulkamania Era" and Ruthless Aggression Era. Don't buy this DLC if they offer it. As a matter of fact, don't buy the game at all. Your "Hulkamania" Era should be rightfully named Golden Era or at least Rock and Wrestling Era if you were a legitimate wrestling fan, but seeing as how you have Doctor Who as you avi on a wrestling site, there is obviously a different precedent for you. I mean, by calling it the Hulkamania Era, you're insisting that Hogan was the only draw during that time. They don't call it the Austin Era, it's the Attitude Era. Do you call the PG Era the Cenation Era, too? Therefore, if you want to throw out Sandow memes, please enlighten me with your irrelevant opinion as to why the Golden Era and Ruthless Aggression Era should take, not equal, but a higher priority than the Attitude Era, you ignorant, self-centered imbecile. I think they should all be equal. I only called for an Attitude Era DLC because they already have the models, moversets, entrance themes, trons, superstar thread settings, etc., ready at the current moment without having to do any added work, apart for remodeling the Booker T model. Obviously, after the statements I've made, I would gladly take anyone and everyone that they gave us for DLC. Yes, not everyone wants it, but I'm sure that if they gave that to us as a DLC pack, everyone would find some use for it somehow. Remember, this would be something extra, as they wouldn't give us anything in exchange if they didn't make it. Reminder, nothing would take its place if they didn't give it to us. Just like the on-disc roster, take what you can get, because saying that a retro Big Show, as pointless as that may be, should not be a roster spot would not give you any one else otherwise. But, you're right 4th Doctor. That's what you want to hear from everyone on here, so I'll go ahead and stroke your ego. It may not be a good idea, but I'm trying to give an idea on how to improve the future for WWE Games, in that we should be able to port rosters over from previous games where the graphics are so similar. However, all you want on this site is a bunch of ignorant yes-men to tell you that every idea or thought you have is the best one possible and if you don't agree with anyone that their opinion is totally irrelevant to the rest of the WWE Universe. You're Welcome. *claps* Bravo! Seriously, throughout the whole post I imagined Jericho sitting behind this desktop. Perfect! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrugFreeMisfit Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 no Attitude era dlc please . If you want Attitude era go play wwe 13 Hulkamania era and Ruthless Aggression Era besides Current guys/divas should be DLC priority over Attitude not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Judging by your standards, maybe you should go play every game before 1992 and between 2001 and 2008 if you want "Hulkamania Era" and Ruthless Aggression Era. Don't buy this DLC if they offer it. As a matter of fact, don't buy the game at all. Your "Hulkamania" Era should be rightfully named Golden Era or at least Rock and Wrestling Era if you were a legitimate wrestling fan, but seeing as how you have Doctor Who as you avi on a wrestling site, there is obviously a different precedent for you. I mean, by calling it the Hulkamania Era, you're insisting that Hogan was the only draw during that time. They don't call it the Austin Era, it's the Attitude Era. Do you call the PG Era the Cenation Era, too? Therefore, if you want to throw out Sandow memes, please enlighten me with your irrelevant opinion as to why the Golden Era and Ruthless Aggression Era should take, not equal, but a higher priority than the Attitude Era, you ignorant, self-centered imbecile. I think they should all be equal. I only called for an Attitude Era DLC because they already have the models, moversets, entrance themes, trons, superstar thread settings, etc., ready at the current moment without having to do any added work, apart for remodeling the Booker T model. Obviously, after the statements I've made, I would gladly take anyone and everyone that they gave us for DLC. Yes, not everyone wants it, but I'm sure that if they gave that to us as a DLC pack, everyone would find some use for it somehow. Remember, this would be something extra, as they wouldn't give us anything in exchange if they didn't make it. Reminder, nothing would take its place if they didn't give it to us. Just like the on-disc roster, take what you can get, because saying that a retro Big Show, as pointless as that may be, should not be a roster spot would not give you any one else otherwise. But, you're right 4th Doctor. That's what you want to hear from everyone on here, so I'll go ahead and stroke your ego. It may not be a good idea, but I'm trying to give an idea on how to improve the future for WWE Games, in that we should be able to port rosters over from previous games where the graphics are so similar. However, all you want on this site is a bunch of ignorant yes-men to tell you that every idea or thought you have is the best one possible and if you don't agree with anyone that their opinion is totally irrelevant to the rest of the WWE Universe. You're Welcome. *claps* Bravo! Seriously, throughout the whole post I imagined Jericho sitting behind this desktop. Perfect! Thanks. I'm all for opposing opinions, as long as there is reasoning behind it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VinceRusso Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 not everybody wants attitude era guys as dlc Not everyone wants Current guys (ask bugsy) can't please everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the King Lives Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Stop Arguing or I'll turn this forum around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.