Miz_fit Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) Does anybody think that jobbers should be in wwe games? I don't mean useless ones like hornswoggle, I mean guys like alex riley and curt hawkins. I don't know if this is a bad thing but I downloaded jobbers in wwe 13 (not hornswoggle). Do you think 2k sports should add jobbers? Edited September 24, 2013 by Miz_Fit Quote
BrotchMrToast Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Not really tbh, they rarely appear on tv anyways Quote
Righteous Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Zack Ryder, Santino, 3MB, Otunga. 6 jobbers right there. Quote
NatWolff43567890 Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 3mb is in 2k14 the usos are jobbers and so are americans sation marella or whatever his name job to swagger but i think every guy in the back should be in WWE Quote
The 4th Doctor Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 3mb is in 2k14 the usos are jobbers and so are americans sation marella or whatever his name job to swagger but i think every guy in the back should be in WWE The Uso's are not Jobbers the have been winning almost all their matches as of late. Quote
NatWolff43567890 Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 3mb is in 2k14 the usos are jobbers and so are americans sation marella or whatever his name job to swagger but i think every guy in the back should be in WWE The Uso's are not Jobbers the have been winning almost all their matches as of late. dont facepalm me the guys i hate are jobbers Quote
The 4th Doctor Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 i'll facepalm you if I want since half the time you don't make a lick of sense. You don't know what a jobber is cause the Uso's don't fit that category Quote
NatWolff43567890 Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 i'll facepalm you if I want since half the time you don't make a lick of sense. You don't know what a jobber is cause the Uso's don't fit that category a jobber is someone who loses everymatch and jobs to a loser i watch WWE and the usos albert and swagger ryder are jobbers Quote
Yin Yang Bought In Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 i'll facepalm you if I want since half the time you don't make a lick of sense. You don't know what a jobber is cause the Uso's don't fit that category a jobber is someone who loses everymatch and jobs to a loser i watch WWE and the usos albert and swagger ryder are jobbers Not quite, a jobber is a person who's only soul purpose in the WWE is to make someone else look stronger/better than they actually are. Quote
bugsyboy Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 To me almost all the current roster are jobbers .Barry horowitz was better than most of them Quote
Red Rooster Posted September 26, 2013 Posted September 26, 2013 To me almost all the current roster are jobbers .Barry horowitz was better than most of them LOL best comment Ive seen in ages Quote
The 4th Doctor Posted September 26, 2013 Posted September 26, 2013 i'll facepalm you if I want since half the time you don't make a lick of sense. You don't know what a jobber is cause the Uso's don't fit that category a jobber is someone who loses everymatch and jobs to a loser i watch WWE and the usos albert and swagger ryder are jobbers The Uso's haven't lost a match since their title pre show match at one of the ppv's. Quote
bugsyboy Posted September 27, 2013 Posted September 27, 2013 Even if they didnt lose in a decade they would still be jobbers. Thats the problem with WWE these days , they try to make superstars out of jobbers. There is only a hand full of today superstars that would have survive in the golden era. The Uso's have absolutely nothing to offer ,No look ,no shape ,disgusting attires and in the ring i dont see nothing i didnt see before. The Young Stallions were jobbers but they had a great look ,a great shape and decent in ring game. Hell im sure Paul Roma could be world champ today Quote
BrotchMrToast Posted September 27, 2013 Posted September 27, 2013 (edited) Even if they didnt lose in a decade they would still be jobbers. Thats the problem with WWE these days , they try to make superstars out of jobbers. There is only a hand full of today superstars that would have survive in the golden era. The Uso's have absolutely nothing to offer ,No look ,no shape ,disgusting attires and in the ring i dont see nothing i didnt see before. The Young Stallions were jobbers but they had a great look ,a great shape and decent in ring game. Hell im sure Paul Roma could be world champ today OH MY GOD, it's fine, we got it, you prefer the Golden Era over the current Era, that's ok but you don't have to mention it in like every thread. You don't like the Usos? Alright, but that doesn't make 'em jobbers. If they win the TT titles, would they still be jobbers just because you say they don't have a look, shape and sh*t? Edited September 27, 2013 by BrotchMrToast Quote
bugsyboy Posted September 28, 2013 Posted September 28, 2013 This is the only thread that i ever talk about the USOS. Now for the last time YES they are jobbers and even if they win the belts 200 time they will still be jobbers. Dont be mad im not expecting you to understand anyway Quote
RoKaDiTz Posted September 28, 2013 Posted September 28, 2013 This is the only thread that i ever talk about the USOS. Now for the last time YES they are jobbers and even if they win the belts 200 time they will still be jobbers. Dont be mad im not expecting you to understand anyway Your logic is just... Quote
BrotchMrToast Posted September 28, 2013 Posted September 28, 2013 This is the only thread that i ever talk about the USOS. Now for the last time YES they are jobbers and even if they win the belts 200 time they will still be jobbers. Dont be mad im not expecting you to understand anyway Dude, I'm not mad or anything, what you say just doesn't make sense. They don't have a look or shape and that's why you think they are jobbers? So Shawn Michaels with his unmuscular body and the poopy brown pants he wore in 2002, he was a jobber aswell, huh? A jobber is someone who loses matches to make his oponents look strong, the Usos on the other hand beat every Tag Team atleast once in the past few months. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.