The Guest Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 (edited) Yes, clear that you are indeed a cuntstain. While you do have the right, there wasn't any need for you to blast CJ over his comment when his comment does have some merit. You could've been the bigger man, but I guess that petty insult was just too good an opportunity to lash out instead of sensibly disagree. Once again, you're a hypocrite. What's it been, a day and you haven't been threatened with suspension? His argument only has merit if we are still in the middle ages. We don't, so it doesn't. I can't believe how daft you are, first you lose the original argument, then change your path to the hypocritical one, which won't make you sound intelligent despite what the left half of your brain will tell you, and merely satisfies your need to reply. I'm sure you will reply again in fact, going back to the point of CJ having "some merit", me saying your wrong again, then you saying I have no right to shoot CJ down again, you losing that, then going back to the Muslim argument etc. etc. etc. Carry on. Edited April 10, 2009 by The Guest Quote
Subrick Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 Subrick, of all the YT athiests you picked, you chose TAA? Thunderf00t > That neckbearded twat. But the important thing is, did you watch the video? Quote
RingMaster2001 Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 (edited) Guys, you are going off topic. So back to Sal v Jitz.... Edited April 10, 2009 by RingMaster2001 Quote
phil Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 But the important thing is, did you watch the video? Yeah, but I wasn't impressed. Hitchens does a better job and he's a drunkard. Quote
System of a Daan Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 (edited) What any religion has in common is the fact that it is a choice. However, as soon as you make that choice you are obliged to shun the non-believers, or even kill, rape, blowup or nail them to a cross... That is why I think religion is retarded. It's ok to believe but believe for yourself and dont make other people share yours. Oh and The Guest, the arguement that Christianity was retarded in the Middle Ages is valid, as you said religion shouldn't change with time. Edited April 11, 2009 by System of a Daan Quote
The Guest Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 Oh and The Guest, the arguement that Christianity was retarded in the Middle Ages is valid, as you said religion shouldn't change with time. I think you'll find I was the one saying Christianity in the Middle Ages was retarded. I said that in retort to Phil backing up CJ's argument that ALL Catholics go ape shit when you ask question, by talking about the Spanish Inquisition. That argument is a middle ages argument, doesn't exist now, and therefore is silly to use. Religion should be what it is has become now in the Church; tolerant of all other faiths, and to work with them. Religion shouldn't change with time, as it loses what it stands for, but the persecution of other religions was a change that shouldn't have happened in the Middle Ages, as it drifted from what the doctrine stated in the first place. Quote
System of a Daan Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 What I was trying to say was I still think any religion is retarded. Even though it managed to bring some decency to humankind, it has always been reason for trouble. Wars, persecution and hatred all derive from religion. Either used to camouflage the fact that the conqueror is actually after wealth and power. Or with such crazy fanatism that rationalising is imposible. I think religion has brought more bad stuff then good stuff over the last 2000 years, to say anything good about it. Quote
The Guest Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 The problem with religion is that it is interpreted by idiots. If you look at most religions, look at the 10 commandments for instance, or even the parables of the Bibles, they are good teachings for how people should live their lives, and instill moral values. I agree that the people who believe the things that are in the bible are factual are a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic, but the teachings are invaluable in my opinion. It is when you get people like Richard I or Saladin or Henry VIII etc etc. who interpret religion and see themselves as the ultimate religious voice undergod that religion culminates into wars and mass murder. If people just stuck to religious teachings and morals, the world would be a better place, but they don't because there are idiots around the world who think they are fighting for the chair to God's right. Quote
Aero Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 "It has served us well, this myth of Christ" which was reportedly stated by Pope Leo X. enough said? Quote
phil Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 "It has served us well, this myth of Christ" which was reportedly stated by Pope Leo X. enough said? Hence another reason why the papacy is absurd, along with Pope Alexander VI. Quote
Subrick Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 (edited) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29734328/ So yeah, the Pope is an idiot. Edited April 11, 2009 by Subrick Quote
phil Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 Phil, please state your reasoning. Alexander VI was a nefarious bastard that framed rich cardinals and other officials in order to confiscate their items and other forms of property in order pay for things he wanted. Quote
The Guest Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 (edited) So are Muslims then... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3340611.stm Not really stated as much as the Pope, considering there are enarly as many Muslims in the world as there as Catholics. Anyway; the religion of not only Catholicism, but also Islam and Judaism, states and promotes moral sexual abstinence. Once again, you are asking for a religion (only Catholicism I might add) to change it's views, when the fact of the matter is people with AIDs should stop having sex. I don't see a problem with condoms at all personally and it would slow the spread of AIDs to an extent, but you are asking a 2000 year old religion to change because of a sexually transmitted disease. If non religious people can't be bothered to wear condoms (see CJ's friend thread), what chance does the whole African continent have? Condoms won't solve the AIDs crisis. Pope John Paul II was correct in saying that a moralistic attitude to sex will stop it. Edited April 11, 2009 by The Guest Quote
Subrick Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 But it's that he said that using condoms will increase the spread of AIDS that's so bullshittingly dumb about it. Quote
The Guest Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 Yes, I'll admit that is stupid. Although I think his abhorration of condoms is due to the fact that they promote casual sex, rather than moral sexual abstinence which the church is overwhelmingly in favour of. Quote
System of a Daan Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Which is another thing that is retarded about church. Quote
RingMaster2001 Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 Which is another thing that is retarded about church. How so? Quote
Aero Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 and jesus said ubto his disciples, on his way to his Crucifixion- "Dont fucking touch my easter eggs, I'll be back on Monday!" Quote
RingMaster2001 Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 I hear that Jade Goody is rising again today. Quote
Aero Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 i heard that she didnt want to be burried, she wanted to be cremated so that any1 who was at her funeral could leave with some of her ashes in a "goody" bag....... cringe Quote
RingMaster2001 Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 You heard about the new reality TV show? Wendy Richard, Natasha Richardson and Jade Goody in I'm In A Cemetery, Get Me Out of Here! Quote
Aero Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 oh god... i hope none of them win... ahahaha hi5 Quote
Big Bizang Posted April 12, 2009 Posted April 12, 2009 What's the difference between cervical cancer and Jack Tweed? I think you can see where I'm going with this... One eats out Jade Goody's cunt the other is Jack Tweed. Quote
Nemo Posted April 29, 2009 Posted April 29, 2009 holy shit, it's been a while. im glad this thread hasnt left page 1. makes me feel less guilty for bumping it. now then, jitty: Heres a quote from the south park ep "red hot catholic love": "All that's dead are your stupid laws and rules! You've forgotten what being a Catholic is all about. This... book [the bible, durka]. You see, these are just stories. Stories that are meant to help people in the right direction. Love your neighbor. Be a good person. That's it! And when you start turning the stories into literal translations of hierarchies and power, well... Well, you end up with this [queen spider and gelgameks]. People are losing faith because they don't see how what you've turned the religion into applies to them! They've lost touch with any idea of any kind of religion, and when they have no mythology to try and live their lives by, well, they just start spewing a bunch of crap out of their mouths!" - father maxi yeah. those south park fellows really hate religion. i've seen plenty of people on tv taking stances against religion. however, the likes of george carlin, bill maher and fuck, even mr atheism himself, richard dawkins NEVER take aim at the religious - just the religions. they don't call the people "fucking idiots" rather, they simply point out the flaws in religion and why they believe it's wrong. while they might share your opinions, jitz, they have different intentions. they seek to inform, you seek to berate and belittle. there's a huge difference. so yeah. go ahead and post videos or whatever it is you said you would do. find me one tv clip where religious people are referred to as "fucking idiots." and make sure the comment isn't directed at a particular group or person. for example, if someone says those folks at the westboro baptist church are fucking nuts, that's only in reference to like 10 out a few billion people. try to avert from scientology as well. nobody likes scientologists. and for the record: i CAN say that all religious people are fucked and that i want to murder them all. that statement alone poses no threat to anybody nor does it infringe on anyone's rights, therefore, im protected by the 1st amendment of the us constitution (free speech, baby!). now if i actually went around telling people that im going to kill them, that might get me in some trouble. probably a lot. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.