Spleenishly-Green Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 (edited) Sorry for the long title. But there are some elements of '07 that are graphically superior, as far as models are concerned. WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007's Model of Randy Orton looks better than his WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2008 Model, for example. 2009 indeed has the best model of his. But glaringly so, if one were to take a second look at '07's models and compare them to it's successor, you'd find some pixelation omissions as far as quality is concerned. No one agrees? Let's discuss this matter. Edited November 13, 2008 by Aero Quote
r-ratedsupastar Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 Never had 07 but the games are suppose to get graphically better each year. Quote
Spleenishly-Green Posted November 13, 2008 Author Posted November 13, 2008 Never had 07 but the games are suppose to get graphically better each year. I know that. But still. There's something about WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007 that intrigues me so. From the roster to the most of the models. I somewhat prefer the look they were going for in THAT game. I'm thinking that they took a step back on WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2008, graphically, because it looked blotchy and drab in comparison to its predecessor's overall cosmetic outlook. The only thing I MIGHT complain about, as far as graphics in WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007 are concerned, is the fact that some DO indeed have a rather rubbery texture to them and the lighting wasn't as bright. It was darker than it's successors. HOWEVER, the colors are more vivid in WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007 than they are in WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2008. I think they redeemed those qualities in WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2009. They took the best of the past two installments and made the best that they could with it. The lighting, texture, graphical quality, and vividness of color are all present on WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007. Quote
Sunny Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 Nah dude. My cousin had '07 for the 360. I compared the graphics extensively and SvR 2009 has increased frame speed and everything. I do agree that the lighting was better for '07 but other than that, I see nothing wrong. We all got a different perspective on this. BTW man, I know ur new and everything. Please don't double-post (Edited). Thanks. Welcome to ST! my friend. Quote
Spleenishly-Green Posted November 13, 2008 Author Posted November 13, 2008 Nah dude. My cousin had '07 for the 360. I compared the graphics extensively and SvR 2009 has increased frame speed and everything. I do agree that the lighting was better for '07 but other than that, I see nothing wrong. We all got a different perspective on this. BTW man, I know ur new and everything. Please don't double-post (Edited). Thanks. Welcome to ST! my friend. I'm not new. And, I also mentioned WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2008 in comparison to WWE Smackdown vs. RAW 2007 (The latter of which I argued to be better than the aforementioned). Quote
manDude Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 You may have been around since the beggining of September, but you only have 5 posts, You're new. Quote
Sabeyta Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 You may have been around since the beggining of September, but you only have 5 posts, You're new. he's got a point.................................................... Quote
bigpoppn Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 Said the guy who registered way after Spleenishly-Green. Quote
Spleenishly-Green Posted November 18, 2008 Author Posted November 18, 2008 You guys have gotten off-topic with the thread's subject. Quote
ALL STAR Posted November 18, 2008 Posted November 18, 2008 And welcome to smacktalks, its a very slim chance things actually stay on topic round here ^_^ Quote
Chillalex Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 (edited) with something like this itd be great to see some examples to back up your claim. Dont think theres a real reason theyd have gotten worse. what do you mean by pixelation omissions? Like, they dont render certain pixels of the screen? : p Comparing the two, SVR 09 looks, to me, better http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/8207...?page=mediaFull vs http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/1424...?page=mediaFull 09 looks nicer to me (with one tiny difference.) You can even see, on 07, the UV seams on the foreground character! 09 also looks to have slightly sharper textures (gogogo compression) Theres really not that much in them though. Your problem is probably with over all lighting set ups which is just a style thing. Edited November 20, 2008 by Chillalex Quote
ALL STAR Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 Heres a quick comparison of Randy Orton and some others SvR 09 is the top images 07 is the bottom. Edge Ring Quote
XxTool7723xX Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 def 09. but i do recall one of the previous 3 games (i think it actually WAS 07) had a really good entrance animation for randy orton. i think they really got the 07 ortan entrance down to a science, but now that he doesn't do the same things in his entrance its kinda hard to compare. Quote
larry54235 Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 if all you can complain about is a little graphix problem maybe you should just stop playing the 2009 and stay with 2007 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.