What for matches you want in SVR2009?

[ECW rulez]

Choose your favoriete

Edited November 24, 2007 by ECW rulez

[Subrick]

I chose I Quit match. But if it is in, it needs to be heavily improved.

[ECW rulez]

I chose I Quit match. But if it is in, it needs to be heavily improved.

I chose Lucha en Jaula Electrificada (Electric Cage Match)

[Subrick]

I don't think they'll put a match in that's never been in WWE. That's like putting a Human Torch match in TNA Impact.

[DX Kidd]

nice analogy subrick...

i chose Extreme Elimination..thts the only one i can see THQ put in next svr game..

[Subrick]

I Quit. Don't forget that and Lumberjack.

[DX Kidd]

Knowing THQ's cheap ass they would just add an I Quit meter...

[takersfan]

God damn it double post im sry

Edited November 24, 2007 by takersfan

[takersfan]

Traditional survivor series 4 on 4 5 on5 because it rules and just add weps to elimination chamber as an option. And make casket and buried alive seperate.add inferno since fire is possible

[The Crow]

I chose the inferno

[DX Kidd]

some how setting someone on fire would boost its rating to M, wouldn't it?

[Aero]

i choose naked pineapple toss match.

[Subrick]

some how setting someone on fire would boost its rating to M, wouldn't it?

Well, you could set someone on fire in WCW Backstage Assault (sort of), and that had a T rating. And in ECW Hardcore Revolution, there was nothing in it that constituted an M, but it had an M anyway.

[takersfan]

Make up ur mind aero that or pineapple of doom..Anyways 2 outta 3 would be nice for them to just insert outta nowhere since its ez

[Aero]

agreed, then they could start with naked pineapple toss, move on to capture the pineapple and finish with pineapple of doom.

[BigBossman]

I remember the last time they had a lumberjack match it was more like a single with 2 managers match. In a lumberjack match, the people outside the ring are supposed to beat the crap out of you regardless of who you are, not take sides.

What is a Punjabi Prison & Elimination Chase match?

Edited December 8, 2007 by BigBossman

[ECW rulez]

I remember the last time they had a lumberjack match it was more like a single with 2 managers match. In a lumberjack match, the people outside the ring are supposed to beat the crap out of you regardless of who you are, not take sides.

What is a Punjabi Prison & Elimination Chase match?

This i have from wikipedia

The Punjabi Prison match consists of two large bamboo cages. The first

Edited December 9, 2007 by ECW rulez

[wraslinfreak]

i voted for traditional survivor series match because ive been waiting for them to add this for a while

[Sunny]

THQ's sissy ass dosen't stick to violence. There's probably gonna throw in an I-Quit or Lumberjack match and that's it. But on the bright side, they have a new Creative Manager so we could be expecting changes.....or probably not. Only time will tell as we find out in November 2008.

[Sorry]

some how setting someone on fire would boost its rating to M, wouldn't it?

Well, you could set someone on fire in WCW Backstage Assault (sort of), and that had a T rating. And in ECW Hardcore Revolution, there was nothing in it that constituted an M, but it had an M anyway.

The wrestlers bled all over!

[cashanova1113]

Choose your favoriete

More than likely they will add 1 or 2 of the suggested, but what will they take away?,, they have to have a happy median with what stays and goes., SD!vsR2008 remove the create a ppv option, which I loved. all these matches will be interesting but for SD!VR2009 they need to pay attention to what the WWE is doing now, p.s. what about a create-a-move option.

[DeathwitAShotgun]

A Traditional Survivor Series match would be cool...I'd like to have a good ol' War Games-style match with the two rings and the cage around the two, but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

Inferno match...been talked about since...oh...WM2000? Meh...don't really care for a glorified 2-man Rumble with fire so much.

"Blank" on a pole matches in general are usually idiotic IMO. It's like a Ladder match without a ladder.

Elimination Chase would be cool...they could have a maximum of 6 to start off...then gradually wittles down to 5...4...to the finish. In that case they'd need to make an option for Fatal-Five and Six-Ways.

Seein' how this is WWE we're talking about, I don't see them putting a Electric/Barbwire/Punjabi Prison Cage in a video game. The first two ones they've never done to my knowledge...and I just don't see them adding the Punjabi Prison in the game.

For any match that doesn't have 5 or 6 wrestlers in the ring at once, Lumberjack should be an option in the Ring Out On/Off. (So it's On/Off/Lumberjack) I believe the No Mercy games did this.

If they take out any match types, I wouldn't miss Buried Alive at all. Especially not if they made TLC matches Triple Threat Tornado Tag again...and they should really bring back the option to make TLC matches Title or Pinfall...so they can seem like TLC matches again, not just Hardcore with some ladders.

[Subrick]

I don't think a War Games match would even be thought for SvR 09. As I said before, it'll be like putting a Human Torch match in the TNA game.

[J_Hardy_Thechamp]

From what I've heard most of these matches ARE infact in 09 I'm not sure of the Electric cage match although that would kick some ass

[eliteX]

Bring back the I Quit match!