ALL STAR Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Here it is from Bound for Glory http://gamingring.com/~mike/Archive/tnaimpact/tnapart2.wmv The game looks solid so far looks quite fast aswell the move look very fluid and the animation when getting hit look very good. As the for the graphics incredable
Joe =/ Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 LOL, owned by a hip toss. Oh my god this game looks awesome, I can't wait. That flying cross body by christian looks fucking sweet.
Smacktalks Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 I thought this game would be like WWF RAW for the XBOX and be a game that looked good, but sucked when it came to gameplay. Being that this is the first in the series on a new console (multiple new consoles) and Midways first attempt at a wrestlng I thought they would have gone for graphics over gameplay. Yet watching that video the gameplay is so smooth and moves look extremely realistic, way more than any Smackdown game I've seen. At the moment I can't see one bad thing about this game, I think what Christian said in the video pretty much sums it up, this is going to be the best wrestling game ever.
Sunny Posted October 21, 2007 Posted October 21, 2007 Simply amazing man. Although I hope they add the cut-scene attires for all the players unlike SvR 2008.
Nemo Posted October 22, 2007 Posted October 22, 2007 i was sold on the jumping piledriver. cant wait to play this game.
takersfan Posted October 22, 2007 Posted October 22, 2007 Guys be reasonable better graphics because they have 20 people in the game.... im not hating this cause im a fanboy but cmon... The moves are really nice i give them that and also multiplayer hasnt even been confirmed so u never know even though im sure theyll have it. And u can never compare both cause wwe has more features and matches and npcs and legends they also have flaming stuff.. my suggestion rent svr and tna see which is better but buy fire pro!
Nemo Posted October 22, 2007 Posted October 22, 2007 you sound like you're nitpicking for reasons to not like this game while validifying those bullshit nitpicks by saying you're a "fanboy". such tomfoolery will not be tolerated! better graphics vs smaller roster - you're a fucking retard. a smaller roster with better graphics is way better than an unnecessarily inflated one full of wrestlers you'll never play as or against online or in season mode. seriously, who the fuck plays as daivari? multiplayer not being confirmed - you're a fucking retard. being unable to compare wwe to tna games - you're a fucking retard. tna can have just as many generic matches as the wwe, it's the gimmick matches that will differ. while i'll miss the hiac, im willing to "sacrifice" that god awful elimination chamber for ultimate x. as far as npcs go (i assume npc sounds for non-playable character) who gives a shit about characters you cant play as? for real, who are these people? commentators or something? wrestling games shouldnt have many npcs to begin with. i dont care about legends, but midway can seek the rights of any legend who isnt signed with the wwe. flaming stuff? wow. you can set things on fire. yeah, im sure that'll be fun for more than 5 mins. my suggestion is that you shut the fuck up and stop hating on games you know nothing about.
The Crow Posted October 23, 2007 Posted October 23, 2007 The graphics and moves are bad ass can't wait to play
takersfan Posted October 24, 2007 Posted October 24, 2007 Fuck off you loser you use retard too much. Fuck off youre just a hater cause u think youre so sick cause u dont buy a friggen game and think youre a rebel. Cmon sal act like your own age its my opinion but i think it will be pretty good too regardless the roster size plus i can name more people in the roster people would like to play as in svr. AND... Those high flying moves....ive seen them in mysterios moveset...and one more thing ultimate control moves theyre awesome and onemore thing tna will never have anything close to triple h undertaker shawn michaels ric flair rock austin or even hart... Now im just gonna expect somee post like atleast we have ze CAnadien destroyerz!!!=) Im just gonna say And if you claim u havent bought the lastest smackdown ga,mes u dont know shit about these game either so stop cintradicting yourself....And thats all i have to say about that...
The Crow Posted October 24, 2007 Posted October 24, 2007 Fuck off you loser you use retard too much. Fuck off youre just a hater cause u think youre so sick cause u dont buy a friggen game and think youre a rebel. Cmon sal act like your own age its my opinion but i think it will be pretty good too regardless the roster size plus i can name more people in the roster people would like to play as in svr. AND... Those high flying moves....ive seen them in mysterios moveset...and one more thing ultimate control moves theyre awesome and onemore thing tna will never have anything close to triple h undertaker shawn michaels ric flair rock austin or even hart... Now im just gonna expect somee post like atleast we have ze CAnadien destroyerz!!!=) Im just gonna say And if you claim u havent bought the lastest smackdown ga,mes u dont know shit about these game either so stop cintradicting yourself....And thats all i have to say about that... I din't mean bad as in suck I meant badass as in awesome.
Nemo Posted October 24, 2007 Posted October 24, 2007 @takersfan you're a fucking retard. the movesets for all the wrestlers you named will probably be in the game. so yeah, tna wont have hhh or ric flair (god knows why anyone would play as ric flair to begin with), but you can just create them, so it's the same shit. also, you're a fucking retard. i dont claim to be a rebel nor am i making any kind of statement by not buying the svr games. i dont buy them because im sick of paying $60 for games that suck. with that said, i've played svr06 and every wwe game before it, so i can make a fair call as to how good the next game will be based on the fact that they're just slight updates on one another. i didnt contradict myself, but even if i did, how does that justify your case? two wrongs dont make a right, you stupid fuck. oh, and you're a fucking retard.
takersfan Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 @sal::::Stop using your fucking retard statement so much it amkes you sound like a fucking retard. And how do you know thios game will be much better. You dont. The thing is this will most likely be dissapointing as is it their first game in a while for wrestling . Do not take this personal im just defending on your attack. Its just my opinion ok? I play smackdown vs raw 2008 you play tna mkay? In that way we both have a good game if they are
Nemo Posted October 26, 2007 Posted October 26, 2007 you're a fucking retard. seriously, did you even read my posts? if you did, you'd see that i never said this game will be better than svr. i said, and i quote, " cant wait to play this game [tna impact]" which means theres a chance of me playing the tna game and not liking it, you god damn tool. this argument has nothing to do with the fact that i dont like svr or whether or me thinking the tna game will be better. you started this by senselessly nitpicking at a game that not only havent you played, but hasnt even been released and wont be for months. you're a fucking retard.
takersfan Posted October 27, 2007 Posted October 27, 2007 Eat a dick. Youre just contradicting urself by saying i havent played this
Nemo Posted October 28, 2007 Posted October 28, 2007 as far as this argument goes, you dont have a leg to stand on. you really dont. instead of sticking to the subject, you go off and say im contradicting myself (which i'll address AGAIN in a moment), which doesnt help your case at all. say i did contradict myself, how does that help your cause? does me contradicting myself make your nitpicks seem less irrational or something? and i answer: no, it doesnt. thinking it does and focusing on it as the last bit of argument you have left is sad and proves that, and i repeat, you're a fucking retard. now then, you seem to enjoy throwing the c-word around, but i dont think you know what it means, so here: con
takersfan Posted October 28, 2007 Posted October 28, 2007 How do you even know this game will be the same as the old smackdown games look at the ratings on mags....
Nemo Posted October 29, 2007 Posted October 29, 2007 so because a game gets good ratings means i have to like it? what kind of bullshit is that? i'll like whatever games i want, not what some ign shill tells me to like.
takersfan Posted October 29, 2007 Posted October 29, 2007 Ass wipe as i said before ill pla ywhat i liek you play what youlike...THEN WERE BOTH HAPPY....mkay?>!!!!!
Nemo Posted October 29, 2007 Posted October 29, 2007 ...look at the ratings on mags.... you also said that, you fucking retard.
Fozy Posted October 29, 2007 Posted October 29, 2007 Smackdown 08 is fucking terrible, just like SvR, SvR 06 and SvR 07.
.png.d0e72cc2fb3a2265f1126da0cae79e00.png)
Recommended Posts