Subrick Posted September 1, 2007 Posted September 1, 2007 Will anyone be seeing that movie? I'm seeing it tonight and it looks awesome. Quote
scoot Posted September 1, 2007 Posted September 1, 2007 looked awsome, however the film fucking sucks balls. the only thing worth noting is the actor who plays the young michael, if he was not so ugly, he could have a great acting career. i like Rob Zombie, but he fucked this one up big time Quote
Subrick Posted September 1, 2007 Author Posted September 1, 2007 Daeg Faerch (Young Michael) was good. One big problem I had with it though was that Dr. Loomis is handled really badly in the script. Other than that, I loved it. Quote
The Great Goro Posted September 2, 2007 Posted September 2, 2007 I, sadly, haven't been able to get to see it yet - can't wait though. Quote
jitz Posted September 2, 2007 Posted September 2, 2007 Yeah it's been getting horrible reviews, but those reviews have labelled the things I love about Rob Zombie movies as the reasons why it's shit. So I don't know what to think. I'm not a Halloween fan, but im going to check this out due to Zombie being at the helm. If it's shit I won't be surprised, after two awesome movies Zombie is due to screw up, after all he just sorted fell into this role as a director after the success House of a 1000 Corpses. Quote
scoot Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 if you havent seen any halloween filmes (particularly the first and second), you might well like the film, being a halloween fan, it just doesnt feel like halloween at all. the suspense just isnt there. in my eyes its fucking shite, in the eyes of someone who hasnt ever seen a halloween film, it might be considered alright. the main thing that pisses me off, is that loomis is supposed to be the deffinition of all that is good, against michaels everything that is bad, and there should have been better character development in both roles to establish that. Quote
Subrick Posted September 3, 2007 Author Posted September 3, 2007 I particualrly liked this movie. Daeg Faerch was the best in the whole movie. The way that Loomis was handled wasn't good at all. The fact that Loomis was killed wasn't good either, it made the ending predictable. Quote
scoot Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 SPOILERS BELOW The fact that Loomis was killed wasn't good either, it made the ending predictable. clearly ive seen the original ending before the new one was filmed, sounds like the first ending was the best. and how is loomis dying predictable? he didnt die in the first movie, why should he die in this one? subrick your a dumb fuck. also, SPOILERS, get your post edited cunt Quote
Subrick Posted September 5, 2007 Author Posted September 5, 2007 Ignoring scoot, there was one thing that was also stupid, but it wasn't in the movie itself. When Laurie asks Loomis if Michael was the boogeyman, people laughed. Quote
Trips Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Can someone just summarise for me then: Is it a new Halloween or a remake? Quote
Subrick Posted September 5, 2007 Author Posted September 5, 2007 (edited) Rob Zombie calls it a "reimagining." Edited September 5, 2007 by Subrick Quote
Aero Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 way to be vague about answering there scoot. its a remake. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.