Quantity vs Quality

[crunk]

So me and my mates had a discussion today about sex, suprise suprise, and there was a interesting arguement brought up.

When it comes to getting action of girls, what's the best approach? Getting action often off many average/poor/ugly chicks or holding out and getting action only off the finest girls?

Some points either way were brought up, such as

- Everythings the same in the dark.

- You've gotta live with that shit for the rest of your life.

- Drink lots and who cares

- Gotta practice on the bad to impress the good.

So yeah, I really don't know where this topic is going.. just discuss without little kids lying about how pimp they are... Thom is the only pimp around here.

[essjay]

this is an interesting one.

ok weve all slept with some1 that we regret.however,its still sex.

if u sleep with a stunner,u feel like a right stud...but for how long...again its still just sex!!

of course we'd all rather sleep with fine ladies,but if we have to settle for 2nd best then so be it.

i cant decide btwn the 2 tho.

however its always good fun

fuck a not so great lookin girl(who dont get laid to often) she will say how much of a stud you are,then word will spread and you will be the stud of the town....sex applenty..good times

**i dont know this from personal experience**

Edited December 29, 2006 by essjay

[CanaMatt]

<This post was deleted due to extraneous hillarity.>

[jitz]

Are you trying to beat Hill for worst topic of the year? If so, good job.

[Nemo]

im pretty sure a girl with an std isnt the same as a girl without one; be it drunk, in the dark, ugly/good looking and/or a good lay.

then again, the people in those herpes commercials seem to be pretty happy, maybe im wrong.

[Thom]

You guys talk as if ugly chicks don't realise you're out of their league!

[jitz]

LMAO.

Honestly, quality posting there Thom.