Rohan Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Whoever votes for tna are weird. They do nothing but still wrestlers from wwe, the crappy ones.
scoot Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 and whomever makes shitty little poles, and trys to force his oppinions upon to others is a little cocky shit head, but thats just my oppinion, anyway TNA is much better than WWE, due to the wrestling they put on, not due to whom works for the company, the WWE has shitty angles, shitty wrestling, and atm is imo shit, get a grip and dont make another pole from which you attempt to force your own oppinions upon to someone
scoot Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 DAM i kneeeeeeeeeeeeeeew id forgot something, thanks aerofreak
Rohan Posted January 5, 2006 Author Posted January 5, 2006 I guess you are all right, but you do have to admitt they are taking crappy wrestlers from the wwe, and has little fans. But one day I admitt they might take over. By the way I wasnt forcing my opinion on someone.
scoot Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) I guess you are all right, but you do have to admitt they are taking crappy wrestlers from the wwe they are taking the mid card tallent, christian for one, should have been given a push a LONG time ago, he was great, there not taking the lesser quallity wrestlers, just the ones that either arent as used or havent had there push yet. By the way I wasnt forcing my opinion on someone. your a stupid cunt, saying 'Whoever votes for tna are weird' IS forcing your oppinion onto other people, by making them believe your oppinion and calling them wierd for believing that TNA produces the better quallity wrestling programe. YOUR A FUCKING MORON Edited January 5, 2006 by scoot
seanironmaiden Posted January 6, 2006 Posted January 6, 2006 TNA > WWE WWE has the big names but that's all it has going for it... well that and billions of dollars... TNA is a way better show. they try waay harder. fair enough, they need to but that's what made ECW so good aswell. I'd much rather watch AJ Styles, Chris Daniels, Raven or Sabu than Triple H, Flair, Batista and fucking cena etc... I could go on but I'm tired
Nemo Posted January 7, 2006 Posted January 7, 2006 first of all, TNA didnt "still" anything. most to all of the talent they sign are FREE AGENTS - WHO WERE FIRED FROM THE WWE. you can argue that they "still" talent from ROH, but ROH wrestlers are all freelancers (meaning, they have no contracts - like ECW). their latest ROH acquisition was homicide. as far as taking WWE wrestlers goes. its rare. the only WWE wrestler to jump ship so far is christian. so yeah, shut the fuck up. thanks. also, WWE > TNA, for now.
jitz Posted January 7, 2006 Posted January 7, 2006 the only WWE wrestler to jump ship so far is christian. And if the WWE keep up their act of sinking the good wrestlers while handing titles to the ones who couldn't work an interesting 30 minute match in their life, well then I think you a lot more are going to jump ship. As Christian said, he didn't do it for the money (WWE would have offered heaps more), he did it so that he could actually wrestle to the best of his ability. Jericho will be in TNA in 2 years or less, he won't go back to WWE, he will take a long break from wrestling though.
The_Enigma05 Posted January 7, 2006 Posted January 7, 2006 TNA has better wrestlers WWE has better storylines
Rohan Posted January 7, 2006 Author Posted January 7, 2006 That's deffinately right. I guess that's the only reason I like WWE so much cause the storylines, but I luv TNA action!
Nemo Posted January 8, 2006 Posted January 8, 2006 Whoever votes for tna are weird. They do nothing but still wrestlers from wwe, the crappy ones.
jitz Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 TNA has better wrestlers WWE has better storylines Well I would argue WWE storytelling abilty at the present for hours on hours and I'd win. As for the comparison, I would argue that TNA don't have any storylines at all so WWE wins by default. TNA has feuds, there is never a proper storyline surrounding the feud it's just that guy doesn't like that guy so they're fighting or that guy respects that guy so they're fighting to see who's the better wrestler in a respectful manner. There's no weddings, no cheating girlfriends, no old woman giving birth to hands, there's no storytelling in TNA just wrestling. Once again, WWE by default.
RocknSock Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 (edited) Has TNA released any video game or do they have many Pay-Per-View shows? Iain: Resize sig. Edited January 10, 2006 by Iain
Aero Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 they are releasing a video game soon and they do have main events fairly regularly now too.
The_Enigma05 Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 (edited) Also don't forget, TNA has only been around for a few years now. It's gonna take some time for TNA to rise to WWE's level. And right now their popularity is increasing, while WWE's popularity is somewhat decreasing. Edited January 9, 2006 by The_Enigma05
scoot Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) fucking hell, rocknsock, get that damed sig size reduced, here at work the screen resolutions are crappy, so please do me a favour and get a diffrent sig, because thats just way too big imo >: Iain: Lighten up, why are you always so fucking pissed off? Edited January 10, 2006 by Iain
Aero Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 yeah its bloody massive, it just about fits in the screen at uni but there is a scroll bar along the bottom as a result. on my home computer it fits in screen but looks shit, its just too big
Rohan Posted January 17, 2006 Author Posted January 17, 2006 Maybe tna might come up with thier great wrestling but wwe is more exciting.
.png.d0e72cc2fb3a2265f1126da0cae79e00.png)
Recommended Posts