Jump to content

DrJoeyMagnum

Recommended Posts

So earlier in the week a member of this forum made a poor argument that the only way you contribute on this site is by making either caws and/or mods, my question is what do you consider contributing?

For me you contribute by making worthwhile topics and posting comments, the only topics for me that don't contribute to the site are topics that just to promote the topic makers YouTube channel and the only kind of posts that don't contribute to the site are the unnecessary dickhead responses and meaningless comments (e.g "looks good bro.......")

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have created something, and you post it in the right sub-forum, I think you contribute by sharing it. I like watching YouTube videos and I also like watching the videos of people on this site because they are a part of the same community as me and I think thats really cool. But if someone has honestly very bad videos and they make a new topic for each video then I think it crosses some line. One video once in a while is alright, and especially if its something different from last time.

I also think making topics in General Chat that can get discussions going (like this one), is contributing because you get people to talk about something that everyone who takes part in, finds interesting in one way or another.

I mean it's kinda basic, don't make several threads around the same topic, don't spam several topics a day, and if you have created something relevant, share it! These are just my opinions as it would go without saying.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One man's trash is another man's treasure. That's why people should be free to like what they want to like, and deem whatever they see fit as a good contribution - without limit or restriction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A forum by definition is a platform for people to give views, opinions, creations etc. It thrives on these things, but also depends on others to give input. As such anything, even a shitty creation that nobody likes or cares about is contribution, just as much so as a topic that creates discussion, be it about current affairs, something a member finds fun/funny or a serious matter. It's all relevant and if it then spawns many replies, even better! 

 

The downfall is if you keep putting shit in, you'll keep getting shit back, and you'll not feel rewarded for it, aka the YouTube video topics you reference. If the quality is good, that's fine. If the quality is poor, and people tell you this, then either try to improve off their advice (a contribution) or look for a different outlet to show your creativity!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So earlier in the week a member of this forum made a poor argument that the only way you contribute on this site is by making either caws and/or mods, my question is what do you consider contributing?

For me you contribute by making worthwhile topics and posting comments, the only topics for me that don't contribute to the site are topics that just to promote the topic makers YouTube channel and the only kind of posts that don't contribute to the site are the unnecessary dickhead responses and meaningless comments (e.g "looks good bro.......")

And here we got Joey jumping to conculssions and assuming shit again, you didn't mean that I am that person right? Because if you do please quote me saying that.

 

Anyway contributing isn't only by creating caws and mods, contributing could be posting news of the game, posting news of the wrestling industry and creating good threads that actually make sense. What's not contributing is creating threads like jeff's onion or da bytching thread and stuff like that, some of those topics could actually be funny (like 10% of them, most are lame.) but creating a funny thread isn't really contributing, you're not helping out people in anyway when you create a thread like that especially when it has racism remarks like da bytching thread for example. So yeah contribuing isn't everything beside youtube videos by people who come here to post them only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Audrey, this topic, whether you feel it is a dig at you or not, was shaping up to be decent! I'm fairly sure you've suggested a few times that the likes of joey never contribute, when, especially if you look in the sport section, he has given a lot, yes there has been arguements too, but hishis views on united his discussions on transfers, his updates on scores and his retorts to other peoples views can be constructive, conversational or funny. If you're telling me that's not contribution then its probably best you stay quiet in this topic and see what other members feel!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So earlier in the week a member of this forum made a poor argument that the only way you contribute on this site is by making either caws and/or mods, my question is what do you consider contributing?

For me you contribute by making worthwhile topics and posting comments, the only topics for me that don't contribute to the site are topics that just to promote the topic makers YouTube channel and the only kind of posts that don't contribute to the site are the unnecessary dickhead responses and meaningless comments (e.g "looks good bro.......")

And here we got Joey jumping to conculssions and assuming shit again, you didn't mean that I am that person right? Because if you do please quote me saying that.

 

Anyway contributing isn't only by creating caws and mods, contributing could be posting news of the game, posting news of the wrestling industry and creating good threads that actually make sense. What's not contributing is creating threads like jeff's onion or da bytching thread and stuff like that, some of those topics could actually be funny (like 10% of them, most are lame.) but creating a funny thread isn't really contributing, you're not helping out people in anyway when you create a thread like that especially when it has racism remarks like da bytching thread for example. So yeah contribuing isn't everything beside youtube videos by people who come here to post them only.

Thats because you don't GET it, threads that you deem none contributing you only see the same people in having a laugh and taking the piss.. so my point is if you don't get it then stay the fuck out of it and quit your whining!!

Edited by pozzum
Removed Racial Slurs
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But I am upset when I see someone who comes here to argue make it to the contributers list. Get your facts right.

I've been doing it before the likes system was invented. I just think since I am doing it it's cool to see all the modders and cawers on the list and not people who come here to have an argument, spam and leave.

Are you mad? As long as I am bugging Paul's ass and not yours you can't really do anything about it. Also let's say it was added because it was popular, do you like everything you see on Facebook? Because in case you do, you're a retard.

I really didn’t want to jump into this but it's impossible to resist as you’ve been self-incriminating yourself by contradicting each statement. Please try to Google that as well and tell me I'm uninformed of the term by insulting whatever intelligence I might have among other things. You are the search engine specialist after all. Hell, I must have copied and pasted this text because it sounds coherent. At the end of the say, I can lay to claim that I attend a highly decorated university and hold a steady job so something still checks out.

I don’t know why there’s a reason to use terms like “jumping to conculssions” (that’s conclusions with a singular s and not plural). Please don’t come with the excuse of how English isn’t your first language. I am fluent in multiple languages myself (Shokran Jazekallah) and I’m learning grammar nuances every day, but I take the time to correct myself because I know I am imperfect. It’s the same thing I remind my brother. If you take the time to look at your faults, you’re one step closer to self-control and piety. 

Brother, and I use that term with the utmost regard to help you. I can empathize with the human condition because I’ve witnessed death and you can’t claim that you’re the only one. I know you’re pissed at the Russian air strikes which are happening without fair warning. I know you are pissed at the beleaguered regime Assad is running. But, there is no reason to translate that angst on here. Breathing is one of the many self-control techniques we exercise in calisthenics, It’s referred to as “mindfulness” and being aware of your actions because it leads to self-actualization. I am surrounded by numerous of other stressful events that visiting this site sometimes alleviates the pressure (no matter how facetious it may sound).

No one is “jumping to conculssions” or having a “concussion” at this point, but simply using your own words against you. Either your words have no value or you’re just going to contradict them just for the sake of arguing, a philosophy which you are against. This is the same as blowing straight hot steam out your ass. Either that or you might need to teach me your version of the English language. Maybe I‘ve been misspelling “conclusions” all this time, and I probably wasn’t emailed the memorandum.

The statement: “I've been doing it before the likes system was invented. I just think since I am doing it it's cool to see all the modders and cawers on the list and not people who come here to have an argument, spam and leave.”

Last time I checked, your posts are cluttered with assumptions and insinuations in accordance to hipster lexicon. Just who are these people who come to this site for argumentative purposes and motivations of spam that they’re just flying overhead the site overlooked?

The same: “I never said Joey, I said people who never contribute, if you wanna assume it's Joey it's up to you. After all each person knows if he's contributing or not if you think you're then good.”

Wasn’t Joey the contributing factor of this ordeal?

“But I am upset when I see someone who comes here to argue make it to the contributers list. Get your facts right.

Then, how does Fufu remain the most deserving to be on the contributor’s’ list if he’s doing the exact thing you’re against?

There is good reason to believe your illogicality has made you erratic to your own bullshit. This reminds me of the time I was in Bangkok. (You might need to Google where that is by the way.) I am not trying to go for a jab at anyone from Thailand and they might even attest to this, but they are very protective over their words. Even when they are wrong, they don’t look at the face of humility and suddenly get defensive over whatever bullshit they were laying to claim. Suddenly, you’d have a knife over your throat just because you disagreed with them and you’d probably end up dead. But, is that really succession or is it an insecure method employed by “ineffectual, effete, soft-penised, debutant” ala the Napoleon Syndrome with a hint of an Oedipus complex.

Auday, if you are sensitive to banter, I suggest not visiting General Chat and deliberately blackmailing the Mods by playing the “race card,” which I might add is the improper term. You can only be “racist” towards someone of African descent.  In addition, there is integrity to uphold in that section. This section in fact, is perhaps the most rigorously moderated of all the sections because it has the history which attributes it and anybody who isn’t thick skinned can’t contain the wordplay which transpires there. This section alone is the proverbial separation of the "men" from the "boys".

I know I can say that you are for all intents and purposes a child prodigy. I know you’ve helped me numerous times in the past because you are adept at your field. But with that reason in mind, you are still a child. It’s evident in your retorts, your incongruities of editing replies, words like “dumbo”, actually trying to have a back and forth with Aero and teaching him what “rules” are. I’m not saying that to demean you but to facilitate you. As a child, you are bound to make mistakes, and you have that free card of not being judged as an adult. You have every right to make a mistake and thus go through trial and error, because the world is at your helm. You are buoyant, but there’s a thing as having too much brawn for your brain. I know I’m not your father and these words are inept to satiate whatever ego you have developed at this age, which is commendable. But, don’t let those complexes get the better of you as a person. You have notable qualities about yourself, but to say you are holding your own in this dispute is an overstatement.

I want to leave by quoting what you said earlier because there are unnecessary rulings being dropped and misuse of the ban button being implemented due to personal feelings.

Are you mad? As long as I am bugging Paul's ass and not yours you can't really do anything about it. Also let's say it was added because it was popular, do you like everything you see on Facebook? Because in case you do, you're a retard.

I think it’s remarkable that even though it was Auday who first brought sodomy in association to Paul, yet he somehow has generated diplomatic immunity and other members have had to feel the full brunt for his words instead like a rippled effect as a result of partiality. The hypocrisy is boundless.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you said but what do you mean by "You can only be “racist” towards someone of African descent"? because surely every race can be racially abused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a real insightful post about that a couple of months back. I might need to dig for it. Just know it's using the term out of context. Its synonym is "negrophobia". A proper term would be "prejudiced". But, in all fairness, it could have to do with different regions of the world approaching to the word differently. Its founding roots happens to be during the enslavement of Africans in America deriving from "racialist". While the word "racism" might be a reference here to "classism" (You see how that's not a word?), it's the word "racist" that has its association to "racialist" and thus the bigotry towards Africans during enslavement or apartheid in South Africa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I am upset when I see someone who comes here to argue make it to the contributers list. Get your facts right.

I've been doing it before the likes system was invented. I just think since I am doing it it's cool to see all the modders and cawers on the list and not people who come here to have an argument, spam and leave.

Are you mad? As long as I am bugging Paul's ass and not yours you can't really do anything about it. Also let's say it was added because it was popular, do you like everything you see on Facebook? Because in case you do, you're a retard.

I really didn’t want to jump into this but it's impossible to resist as you’ve been self-incriminating yourself by contradicting each statement. Please try to Google that as well and tell me I'm uninformed of the term by insulting whatever intelligence I might have among other things. You are the search engine specialist after all. Hell, I must have copied and pasted this text because it sounds coherent. At the end of the say, I can lay to claim that I attend a highly decorated university and hold a steady job so something still checks out.

I don’t know why there’s a reason to use terms like “jumping to conculssions” (that’s conclusions with a singular s and not plural). Please don’t come with the excuse of how English isn’t your first language. I am fluent in multiple languages myself (Shokran Jazekallah) and I’m learning grammar nuances every day, but I take the time to correct myself because I know I am imperfect. It’s the same thing I remind my brother. If you take the time to look at your faults, you’re one step closer to self-control and piety. 

Brother, and I use that term with the utmost regard to help you. I can empathize with the human condition because I’ve witnessed death and you can’t claim that you’re the only one. I know you’re pissed at the Russian air strikes which are happening without fair warning. I know you are pissed at the beleaguered regime Assad is running. But, there is no reason to translate that angst on here. Breathing is one of the many self-control techniques we exercise in calisthenics, It’s referred to as “mindfulness” and being aware of your actions because it leads to self-actualization. I have am surrounded by numerous of other stressful events that coming to this site sometimes alleviates the pressure (no matter how facetious it may sound).

No one is “jumping to conculssions” or having a “concussion” at this point, but simply using your own words against you. Either your words have no value or you’re just going to contradict them just for the sake of arguing, a philosophy which you are against. This is the same as blowing straight hot steam out your ass. Either that or you might need to teach me your version of the English language. Maybe I ‘ve been misspelling “conclusions” all this time, and I probably wasn’t emailed the memorandum.

The statement: “I've been doing it before the likes system was invented. I just think since I am doing it it's cool to see all the modders and cawers on the list and not people who come here to have an argument, spam and leave.”

Last time I checked, your posts are cluttered with assumptions and insinuations in accordance to hipster lexicon. Just who are these people who come to this site for argumentative purposes and motivations of spam that they’re just flying overhead the site overlooked?

The same: “I never said Joey, I said people who never contribute, if you wanna assume it's Joey it's up to you. After all each person knows if he's contributing or not if you think you're then good.”

Wasn’t Joey the contributing factor of this ordeal?

“But I am upset when I see someone who comes here to argue make it to the contributers list. Get your facts right.

Then, how does Fufu remain the most deserving to be on the contributor’s’ list if he’s doing the exact thing you’re against?

There is good reason to believe your illogicality has made you erratic to your own bullshit. This reminds me of the time I was in Bangkok. (You might need to Google where that is by the way.) I am not trying to go for a jab at anyone from Thailand and they might even attest to this, but they are very protective over their words. Even when they are wrong, they don’t look at the face of humility and suddenly get defensive over whatever bullshit they were laying to claim. Suddenly, you’d have a knife over your throat just because you disagreed with them and you’d probably end up dead. But, is that really succession or is it an insecure method employed by “ineffectual, effete, soft-penised, debutant” ala the Napoleon Syndrome with a hint of an Oedipus complex.

Auday, if you are sensitive to banter, I suggest not visiting General Chat and deliberately blackmailing the Mods by playing the “race card,” which I might add is the improper term. You can only be “racist” towards someone of African descent.  In addition, there is integrity to uphold in that section. That section in fact, is perhaps the most rigorously moderated of all the sections because it has the history which attributes it and anybody who isn’t thick skinned can’t contain the wordplay which transpires there.

I know I can say that you are for all intents and purposes a child prodigy. I know you’ve helped me numerous times in the past because you are adept at your field. But with that reason in mind, you are still a child. It’s evident in your retorts, your incongruities of editing replies, words like “dumbo”, actually trying to have a back and forth with Aero and teaching him what “rules” are. I’m not saying that to demean you but to facilitate you. As a child, you are bound to make mistakes, and you have that free card of not being judged as an adult. You have every right to make a mistake and thus go through trial and error, because the world is at your helm. You are buoyant, but there’s a thing as having too much brawn for your brain. I know I’m not your father and these words are inept to satiate whatever ego you have developed at this age, which is commendable. But, don’t let those complexes get the better of you as a person. You have notable qualities about yourself, but to say you are holding your own in this dispute is an overstatement.

I want to leave by quoting what you said earlier because there are unnecessary rulings being dropped and misuse of the ban button being implemented due to personal feelings.

Are you mad? As long as I am bugging Paul's ass and not yours you can't really do anything about it. Also let's say it was added because it was popular, do you like everything you see on Facebook? Because in case you do, you're a retard.

I think it’s remarkable that even though it was Auday who first brought sodomy in association to Paul, he somehow has generated diplomatic immunity and other members have had to feel the full brunt for his words instead like a rippled effect as a result of partiality. The hypocrisy is boundless.

 

See, that's my point. When you guys have nothing to say you try to change the whole point and talk to me about my grammar or english language. I really hope you stop trying to act smart because whatever you said in arabic is wrong, you didn't spell it correctly when trying to convert it to english, (might wanna google it first next time before embarrassing yourself) because it's JazakAllah not Jazekallah, first of all you replaced the a by an e and didn't capitalize Allah which is god in arabic, as far as I know gods are capitalized in English. So just like I misspelled on my second language you did right now on your probably 19th lnaguage since you speak a lot of languages.

Also again, trying to bring out the conflict in my country and using racism against me isn't really a strong point, because it has nothing to do with what we're talking about and it shows how weak you're that you're bringing up any point to try and insult me with, also just for your knowledge the whole Russian airstrike thing was planned between Syria and Russia, Russia stands with Al Assad and Al Assad is actually loved by the Syrian Citezens, Syrian citizens are actually happy that Russia is getting involved and helping out take ISIS. One more thing you don't know, I don't really care who rules Syria or what happens over there as long as nobody is getting killed by ISIS, I lived out of Syria the most of my life and I only lived there like 4 years.

Also I know where Bangkok is, I travelled a lot in my life and I am pretty sure that I know over 85% of the countries. I visited all the continents at least once except for South America.

Also again, I never said Joey, but hey if you wanna assume I meant Joey, you can. The only reason I can stand Fufu the most is because at least he's done stuff that actually is hard and did a lot for the community, although he stole my texture but yeah whatever.

Also:

rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun
 
  1. the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
     
     
     

    Racism can actually be used between all races like Mexicans, Middle Eastrens and African Americans, saying that it's only used for African Americans makes you look bad consediring you wasted around 30 minutes typing that reply and trying to act smart but you completley screwed it up now. Also I will report people who are racist to me, you can't really do anything about it, you need to stop taking sides and do your job like you're supposed to do it. But hey, I know that these guys dicks are too delecious for ya, I can understand.

     

    Also saying that I am a child is probably another thing that screwed your reply, I probably act more mature than everyone who's arguing with me. WAIT, wasn't it you the one who had boobs in their signature months ago? Because I thought you're grown up, pervert. I mean even my 2 years old cousin wouldn't put boobs in his forum signature.

     

     

Edited by pozzum
removing references to removed comments
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always with the pissing contest too, I WOULDN'T MAKE ANOTHER ACCOUNT IF I WAS SUSPENDED! No, maybe not. I don't care. It's not hard to circumvent a ban, there's other people here who I enjoy company with and that's all I really care about. I'm not coming back to fight the system or to get the most likes. I just like seeing what Sunny, Joey, Fufu, Aero, Don, Jitz, Jeff and others post. I work way too much these days and the site is pretty dead anyway usually so it's not like I miss much when I do get suspended.

In fact, I'm tired as fuck just now and might just go to sleep.

Auday you're only slightly amusing, Jeff get's all my attention because his retaliations are awesome. You're just like the million other keyboard gangsters at your age, predictable and boring. You're not even half the user Jeff is. I could've replied ages ago when this tirade started but it's just monotonous. Being here over 10 years, there's been a lot of Auday's most have grown up to be cool, I think you have it in you too.

Hahahahahahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, I am probably a keyboard gangster, it isn;t you tho because nowadays keyboard gangsters stick and good people get banned. ahahahaha. anyway if you guys think I am a kiddo, good because I never wanna grow up, I like being a kiddo and seeing someone who's over 21 getting banned. hahahahahahahahah.

That was an almost indecipherable piece of shit that just fell out of your mouth there audley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sig was more of how long will I have it until it was forcefully taken away. The forum has changed dramatically in the course of a few years so it was more of an insider joke and before you were even a member. Someone finally noticed.

Your two-year old cousin might be the first recorded human to date with a developed hippocampus in formulating own thoughts. Descartes would be spinning in his grave. Last I checked, stem cell research was against the rules. Are you breaking the rules? Anything but that!

Jazekallah or JazakAllah Khair: either word isn't what one would consider proper because it is all lost in translation when converting to English. There is no official parameter in spelling whereas there are grammar rules, punctuation, and structure to abide by in King James's version of the English language.

I have done nothing so in my last post to insult you. It's you “jumping to conculssions” again Audrey. Simulating fact and logic with personal conviction is a flaw of the human design.

The "Al Assad is actually loved by the Syrian Citezens" (that is "citizens" by the way), is a fallacy in the correct notion of the term. The families of 8,000 Syrians would beg to differ. The "I don't really care who rules Syria or what happens over there as long as nobody is getting killed" is an assertion to which stipulates you have no nationalistic pride. There is no reason for you to avoid where you're from in fear of scapegoating or try leading a double life billing yourself from Texas. Then, you have no real identity. The fact that you would even say Syrian citizens venerate Assad as a hero is you believing your own bullshit again. That, or it's distortion by the Western media similar to portraying Hosni Mubarak as a revolutionary and putting someone who was vowing progress in jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sig was more of how long will I have it until it was forcefully taken away. The forum has changed dramatically in the course of a few years so it was more of an insider joke and before you were even a member. Someone finally noticed.

Your two-year old cousin might be the first recorded human to date with a developed hippocampus in formulating own thoughts. Last I checked, stem cell research was against the rules. Are you breaking the rules? Anything but that!

Jazekallah or JazakAllah Khair: either word isn't what one would consider proper because it is all lost in translation when converting to English. There is no official parameter in spelling whereas there are grammar rules in King James's version of the English language. I have done nothing so in my last post to insult you. It's you “jumping to conculssions” again Audrey. The "Al Assad is actually loved by the Syrian Citezens" (that is "citizens" by the way), is a fallacy in the correct notion of the term. The families of 8,000 Syrians would beg to differ. The "I don't really care who rules Syria or what happens over there as long as nobody is getting killed" is an assertion to which stipulates you have no nationalistic pride. There is no reason for you to avoid where you're from in fear of scapegoating or try leading a double life billing yourself from Texas. Then, you have no real identity. The fact that you would even say Syrian citizens venerate Assad as a hero is you believing your own bullshit again or distortion by the Western media just like how they portray Hosni Mubarak as a revolutionary and putting someone who was vowing progress in jail.

Have you ever been to Syria? No, I've been to Syria and interacted with Syrians, at least 90% of the Syrians I interacted with said that they actually believe that Al Assad is the best leader for Syria, Believing everything the media says is the worst thing to do, also to inform you ALL the arabian media was against Al Assad, it was only the Syrian media that is actually with him. Also just because I don't care who rules Syria dosen't mean I don't have national pride or ashamed of my country, like I told you before I lived most of my life out of Syria, it's just like you being form the United States and growing up somewhere else, you'd probably feel more interactive in the country you grew up in. If you watch shows of Syria before ISIS invaded it, you'd know how good Syria was so no, there is nothing I am ashamed of and I never tried to bill myself from Texas, it's just you jumping to conclusions (I fixed the s for you, don't cry.) Also Hosni Mubarak wasn't the best president ever, but he was actually better than Morsi, Morsi is a part of the muslim brothers which is a group who uses Islam as an excuse to do shitty things, he tended to turn Egypt into a country for muslims only, if that's what you think a good progressive president is then I don't know what to tell you, I lived in all the countries we're discussing right now, so don't try to argue with me because I actually talk to people who are living there and not just basing my bullshit of media, only time where you can correct me is when we talk about the U.S because you probably know a lot more than I do about it, but when it comes to the middle east, I for sure know more than you.

Always with the pissing contest too, I WOULDN'T MAKE ANOTHER ACCOUNT IF I WAS SUSPENDED! No, maybe not. I don't care. It's not hard to circumvent a ban, there's other people here who I enjoy company with and that's all I really care about. I'm not coming back to fight the system or to get the most likes. I just like seeing what Sunny, Joey, Fufu, Aero, Don, Jitz, Jeff and others post. I work way too much these days and the site is pretty dead anyway usually so it's not like I miss much when I do get suspended.

In fact, I'm tired as fuck just now and might just go to sleep.

Auday you're only slightly amusing, Jeff get's all my attention because his retaliations are awesome. You're just like the million other keyboard gangsters at your age, predictable and boring. You're not even half the user Jeff is. I could've replied ages ago when this tirade started but it's just monotonous. Being here over 10 years, there's been a lot of Auday's most have grown up to be cool, I think you have it in you too.

Hahahahahahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, I am probably a keyboard gangster, it isn;t you tho because nowadays keyboard gangsters stick and good people get banned. ahahahaha. anyway if you guys think I am a kiddo, good because I never wanna grow up, I like being a kiddo and seeing someone who's over 21 getting banned. hahahahahahahahah.

That was an almost indecipherable piece of shit that just fell out of your mouth there audley.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMAnCgjeZ4Q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to recover what started as a decent thread.

My own personal take as long as it's in a decently appropriate area and isn't arguments/in fighting I'd call it contribution.  Hell even if you are just playing forum games all day you are still contributing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

s8TZSdC.jpg

 

...and I never tried to bill myself from Texas, it's just you jumping to conclusions

That used to say Damascus before.

I probably act more mature than everyone who's arguing with me.

This was a discussion on the meaning of the term "contribution" until you came with the intention of arguing. You could have taken your own advice and discussed the ordeal in a mature fashion. Also, instead of reporting Pete for mother jokes, do yourself a favor and clean out your profile before you do.

WAIT, wasn't it you the one who had boobs in their signature months ago?

That was more than two years ago. If your amygdala had no trouble registering your first glance at teat, then why are you so blind to what you posted just three days prior? Implicit memory or not having credence?

I don't really remember, tell us more about the story. I don't memorize each post I post in my head. But make sure not to assume shit again while trying to give us a rewind about what happened.

It further proves your words are empty and can't be taken at face value. Besides, I don't need you stroking me off or need someone's validation. I don't have a high opinion of myself and consider to be an elitist to compensate for a small penis. I don't underperform or suffer from symptoms relating to anxiety either.

The reason I said i thought he was smarter is because he wasn't able to comprehend what I've said, just like you.

You can claim anything about the United States based on supposition, and it will most likely turn out to be true because of all the dirty politics. I, simply living in the United States doesn’t make me a resident expert of the idiosyncrasies which occur here and I’ll most likely tend to agree with you based on humanitarian grounds.

“I lived out of Syria the most of my life and I only lived there like 4 years.”

This means you’re consequently living out biases which were dispensed from someone in your household. Mubarak’s edicts were enforced for defensive purposes which were put out of context by Western conspiracies and Netanyahu who referred to it as an “Islamic coup”. These feelings are fortified by their utmost hatred of the Islamic caliphate based on predisposed notions and Ayatollah Khomeini’s regime in Iran. This doesn’t even include the numerous other unreliable charges which he was accused of including espionage on his own military.

I am not stating any of this based on media proclamation whatsoever, but pointing to the fabrications which are portrayed by mass propaganda (e.g. the opposite of what I'm saying.) As far as you "knowing more" about the United States than me, I would be willing to corroborate that you in fact will because you are an outsider who has researched on this country’s culture and you’ll perhaps be exasperated at most of the things which are going wrong. It’s a comparison you may already be familiar with. A Muslim convert will know more about the habits of the religion instead of a steadfast practitioner who was born into it. Now sure, your experiences are much different than mine as I have visited these countries in the past only as a student, but simply asserting you know more is egotistically stroking your own cock.

A member yesterday referenced on the shootings which ensued in Oregon. You and I both know the same facts as they were reported, but you can clearly see the bullshit which CNN is standing on. This is not a competition of “you vs. I”, “I vs. you”, but you have clearly made it so, which is why this topic was created because words have meanings than those same words have different meanings in accordance to you. This whole doctrine of the “world revolving around me” has already been claimed by Audays before. Hell, I can even say that I was an Auday before "being Auday" was in season. It’s all the perception age has on ideologies. If pandering for likes based on “contribution” is the case, then Joey and Fufu have contributed the most because their likes denote as such because of majority ruling. Just know the more likes someone has doesn’t make their dick any bigger and the cry for attention only isolates them further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True that. With that type of attitude, you'll be in good company soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...