What did you think of the game? The first half was pretty bad imo.
I really dont rate Defoe as an England striker, he does well coming off the bench later on but I've never seen him have a good game when he's started.
The changes at half time made a huge difference, I thought Carrick played a load of good balls that seemed to be missing from Lampard's play and obviously Crouch and Wright-Phillips worked well together to create the goals.
For once I dont see the paper's coming out and saying England will now win the World Cup, instead it'll carry on with the fact that John Terry got booed so badly.
England vs. Eygpyt
Started by Smacktalks, Mar 03 2010 10:46 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 March 2010 - 10:46 PM
#2
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:39 AM
i didnt watch it, it was a friendly!
these 1 off friendlies are pretty pointless, cut them out, get the premiership finished a week or 2 earlier and have a few before the world cup etc and teams will gel better.
these 1 off friendlies are pretty pointless, cut them out, get the premiership finished a week or 2 earlier and have a few before the world cup etc and teams will gel better.
#3
Posted 07 March 2010 - 12:09 AM
It was worth playing, it gives Capello a chance to see how well certain players play well together.
Walcott as rubbish imo, yet he seems to be back on form today for Arsenal.
Walcott as rubbish imo, yet he seems to be back on form today for Arsenal.
#4
Posted 07 March 2010 - 02:16 AM
some players need a bit of time to gel, and some times players take time to get used to different positions, possibly walcotts problem, and as such 1 off friendlies are cock!
#5
Posted 07 March 2010 - 04:15 PM
I figured you'd like the friendly matches, without them you'd rarely ever see Ireland in action!
#6
Posted 07 March 2010 - 07:29 PM
lol who wants to see us get beat by albania in a friendly! i'd much rather see us win a few qualifying matches against big teams, only to lose against the shit 1s and still not qualify lol














