19 replies to this topic

[MasterOfTheSwanton]

The member rank titles have been the same for a few years now, so I think it's time we updated them. Therefore, what ranks would you like to see added and how many posts would it take to achive that ranking?

Here's an example.

Jobber - 0 Posts
Rising Star - 10 Posts
Crusierweight - 20 Posts
High Flyer - 30 Posts
X Division Champion - 40 Posts
Hardcore Champion - 50 Posts
Intercontinental Champion - 65 Posts
United States Champion - 80 Posts
People's Champion - 100 Posts
World Heavyweight Champion - 125 Posts
WWE Champion - 150 Posts
Loyal Member - 200 Posts
Old Skool Member - 500 Posts

Simply reply with the ranks you'd like to see and the best ones will get added!

[bigpoppn]

I suggest we create a new rank called "moron".
It will only have one member tho..

[MasterOfTheSwanton]

"he" would just change it using a custom title though.

Any real suggestions?

[Aero]

i vote we change high flier to diva champion

[phil]

Pretty good list, Swanton. I modified it and made into this:

Jobber - 0 Posts
Rookie - 20 Posts
ST! Cruiserweight division - 40 Posts
ST! European / Hardcore division - 60 Posts
ST! Intercontinental / United States division - 80 Posts
Mid-carder - 100 Posts
ST! World Heavyweight division - 120 Posts
Main eventer - 140 Posts
ST! Loyal member - 200 Posts
ST! Legend - 500 Posts
ST! Hall of Famer - 1000 Posts

Yes or no?

[takersfan]

Most of us are over 1000 posts. I say 10,000+ should be seriously... ala gears just to add depth.

Edited by takersfan, 15 August 2008 - 04:09 AM.

[MasterOfTheSwanton]

Looks good phil, but should Intercontinental / United States division not be after mid-carder?
Same for main eventer and World Heavyweight division?

What about this amount of posts takersfan?

Jobber - 0 Posts
Rookie - 20 Posts
ST! Cruiserweight division - 50 Posts
ST! European / Hardcore division - 70 Posts
Mid-carder - 90 Posts
ST! Intercontinental / United States division - 120 Posts
Main eventer - 150 Posts
ST! World Heavyweight division - 200 Posts
ST! Loyal member - 500 Posts
ST! Legend - 1000 Posts
ST! Hall of Famer - 1500 Posts

[takersfan]

Thats better i guess.

[phil]

Nice update, Swanton. I like it, but I think takersfan is right about the ST! Hall of Fame ranking being for those only with 10,000+ posts.

[Aero]

but then ppl will bitch about not being able to have stupid personalised 1s... cept for me etc lol... plus it could spark MORE spam from subdick

[Smacktalks]

I've updated to show the amounts below.

ST! Loyal member - 500 Posts
ST! Legend - 5000 Posts
ST! Hall of Famer - 10,000 Posts

The custom titles are still able to be used, these will only show if you haven't gave yourself a custom title.

[Niles Jansen The Third]

Could we have ranks NOT associated with wrestling divisions and weight classes?
Maybe something a bit more original.

Not that I have any ideas, it just seems those types of user titles are over done, and most of us here are all over the age of 16 and no longer see the novelty in being ranked as a heavyweight champion.

[Smacktalks]

As it's a wrestling orientated board I think it's best with ranks associated with wrestling, if you dont want one you can always have your own custom title like you already have.

[Joe =/]

Yeah screw you CJ, you're just mad you'll never make heavyweight champ.

[bigpoppn]

Aero, I haven't seen him for awhile here, I wonder what happened...

[Joe =/]

I didn't touch him.

[Salazzle]

all of your ranks imply that cruiserweights and tag teams are inferior to heavyweight singles wrestlers. bullshit.

mark, smark, indy wrestler, jobber, show opener, mid carder, main eventer, legend, hall of famer

dunno if thats the BEST list, but at least it's somewhat accurate.

[Aero]

bigpoppn, on Aug 18 2008, 10:28 AM, said:

Aero, I haven't seen him for awhile here, I wonder what happened...

JOE RAPED ME!!!!

nah, internet was down for 2 weeks.

[salizzle]

why cant we have something less lame?

[phil]

Enlighten us then, Iain.